[Dimensio]

YOU are the one who brought this DESIGNED software into question: not me!

And I was not making an analogy regarding the DESIGN of the software, I was making an analogy regarding knowledge of subject matter. Either you are incredibly stupid and did not know this or -- more likely -- you were dishonestly attempting to change the subject because you know that it is impossible to defend Phil Johnson on this matter.

Hijacking my analogy to turn it into a different one to suit your agenda, when I never claimed that the two subjects were analagous in that way, is fundamentally dishonest of you. You are a liar and a fraud for doing it.

[Elsie]

Wow!


Your panties are REALLY in a wad!


Take a break or I'll have some random alpha particles tossed into your memory cells.

[Elsie]

And I was not making an analogy regarding the DESIGN of the software, I was making an analogy regarding knowledge of subject matter.

Then you should have made YOUR intentions more clear to begin with.

---

What's that old saying (I think it has to do with husbands saying dumb things to their wives), "If anything I say can be taken so that you are offended by it; I meant it the other way."

[Terriergal]

YOU are the one who brought this DESIGNED software into question: not me!

And I was not making an analogy regarding the DESIGN of the software

I think the point is, even YOU wouldn't be so silly as to admit that software arises spontaneously, even something as error-ridden as Microslop... yet something infintely more complex and unnatural does, to you. Hm... seems like an intellectual disconnect there to me.... but again, that won't matter to those who've already pre-decided that there couldn't POSSIBLY be a transcendent intellect.