[shubi]

I don't have any experience at coding computer stuff. I doubt if I could tell anything about your work.

[Dimensio]

Surely you could use your understanding of logical principles to tell me whether or not I've written it efficiently or whether or not it meets my stated objectives. I mean, Phil Johnson claims to be able to assess claims made by biologists even though he has no training in biology, and so many creationists insist that he doesn't have to know anything about biology to understand arguments made by biologists, so surely it should be trivial for someone to look at a program written by a student just learning about assembly language and determine whether or not it meets stated objectives.

Any Phil Johnson-defenders here with no assembly experience want to take a crack at it, or at least explain why your inability to analyze my code without a background understanding of the principles involved doesn't compare with Phil Johnson analyzing claims made by biologists despite his lack of expertise?