To: shubi
Surely you could use your understanding of logical principles to tell me whether or not I've written it efficiently or whether or not it meets my stated objectives. I mean, Phil Johnson claims to be able to assess claims made by biologists even though he has no training in biology, and so many creationists insist that he doesn't have to know anything about biology to understand arguments made by biologists, so surely it should be trivial for someone to look at a program written by a student just learning about assembly language and determine whether or not it meets stated objectives.
Any Phil Johnson-defenders here with no assembly experience want to take a crack at it, or at least explain why your inability to analyze my code without a background understanding of the principles involved doesn't compare with Phil Johnson analyzing claims made by biologists despite his lack of expertise?
746 posted on
02/24/2005 9:34:49 AM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
Since I am a biologist, I guess Phil would think I am not qualified to practice logic. ;-)
751 posted on
02/24/2005 10:11:59 AM PST by
shubi
(Peace through superior firepower.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson