Skip to comments.
Anthropologist resigns in 'dating disaster'
Worlnetdaily ^
| February 19, 2005
| unattributed
Posted on 02/19/2005 7:36:30 AM PST by Woodworker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480 ... 841-843 next last
To: RaceBannon
"I aint got the time! I have homework, too! (night classes, going for an EE. )"
Yikes, another engineer that won't understand scientific method. This is getting scary. What Bible College offers and engineering degree?
You know that electricity is just a theory?
441
posted on
02/22/2005 5:55:25 AM PST
by
shubi
(Peace through superior firepower.)
To: shubi; Dimensio
Hmm, think I touched a nerve?
To: PatrickHenry
"What could possibly reduce an essentially good person to behaving the way they do?"
Fear. They are afraid of going to H E double hockey sticks, of losing their friends in church, of going against the authority of their pastor, of having their wife leave them if they don't believe in the literal Word etc.
A lot of it is cognitive dissonance caused by fear. Fear is a key factor in a lot of mental illness. The sad thing is that for Christians, Jesus alleviates fear through love and gives us peace in all circumstances. This is why Christian belief often heals mental illness.
443
posted on
02/22/2005 6:00:04 AM PST
by
shubi
(Peace through superior firepower.)
To: Ichneumon
You touched a nerve with a cattle prod. LOL
444
posted on
02/22/2005 6:01:34 AM PST
by
shubi
(Peace through superior firepower.)
To: RaceBannon
Funny how this thread went from talking about an
Anthropologist (scientist) who made up data (not surprising), plagiarized works (not surprising), and fooled the public for many years, to an attack on creationists. This dude still has science textbooks in circulation! Of course, none of the 'scientists' here give a crap about that.
Do the evo's have ANY idea how silly they look on this thread. It's hilarious!
445
posted on
02/22/2005 6:06:25 AM PST
by
Michael_Michaelangelo
(The best theory is not ipso facto a good theory. Lots of links on my homepage...)
To: shubi
You touched a nerve with a cattle prod. LOLGolly, I wish I had't made that comment about "cut-and-paste". Really.
446
posted on
02/22/2005 6:07:03 AM PST
by
Thatcherite
(Conservative and Biblical Literalist are not synonymous)
To: shubi
What Bible College offers and engineering degree?Huh? Where did you get *your* degree, Shubi? You have a Ph.D, right?
447
posted on
02/22/2005 6:07:41 AM PST
by
Michael_Michaelangelo
(The best theory is not ipso facto a good theory. Lots of links on my homepage...)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
I have a Dr. in ministry-six years of seminary.
448
posted on
02/22/2005 6:10:59 AM PST
by
shubi
(Peace through superior firepower.)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
Anthropologists are closer to the semi-science of sociology than they are to the real science of biology. So, we have that going for us. ;-)
449
posted on
02/22/2005 6:12:25 AM PST
by
shubi
(Peace through superior firepower.)
To: Thatcherite
Everyone is good at something. Race is really good at cutting and pasting.
450
posted on
02/22/2005 6:14:51 AM PST
by
shubi
(Peace through superior firepower.)
To: shubi
Anthropologists are closer to the semi-science of sociology than they are to the real science of biology.Interesting.
451
posted on
02/22/2005 6:16:59 AM PST
by
Michael_Michaelangelo
(The best theory is not ipso facto a good theory. Lots of links on my homepage...)
To: shubi
Everyone is good at something. Race is really good at cutting and pasting. Actually, if he were actually good at it, he'd cut-and-paste material that was both valid and relevant.
To: Ichneumon
Actually, if he were actually good at it, he'd cut-and-paste material that was both valid and relevant.Yeah, he can manage the following:
invalid and irrelevant
valid and irrelevant
invalid and relevant
Its just the remaining possibility (as you've pointed out) that proves out of his reach. ;)
453
posted on
02/22/2005 6:22:27 AM PST
by
Thatcherite
(Conservative and Biblical Literalist are not synonymous)
To: RaceBannon; Dimensio; shubi; PatrickHenry; Thatcherite; Michael_Michaelangelo
This is a spiritual battle. You need to believe what the Bible says. All the science in the world will not convert someone who is dead in their sins, you need to be converted. I will no longer show you the science that proves you wrong. I have shown you enough of the sciece that proves you wrong that if oyu were intellectually honest, you would be admitting some things right now, thinking of others that challenged your present train of thought. You need to be saved. At pain of the rack, and the purification of the stake, no doubt.
To: Thatcherite
And he was complaining about YOU spamming. LOL!
455
posted on
02/22/2005 6:29:30 AM PST
by
Long Cut
(The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
To: Ichneumon
What do you expect? Scientists are now saying it's "in the genes."
Is Religion All in the Genes?
...modern science is turning up a possible reason why the religious right is flourishing and secular liberals aren't: instinct. It turns out that our DNA may predispose humans toward religious faith.
You can't *stop* evolution, Itchi, you can only hope to contain it. :)
456
posted on
02/22/2005 6:31:51 AM PST
by
Michael_Michaelangelo
(The best theory is not ipso facto a good theory. Lots of links on my homepage...)
To: RaceBannon
I will no longer show you the science that proves you wrong. To do something "no longer" implies that you were doing it in the first place. I must have missed that bit.
I was hoping that you'd start showing us some valid science at some stage, rather than just cut-and-pasting or paraphrasing a pile of junky discredited arguments from YEC websites and publications.
BTW the "I never read Kent Hovind" when you'd posted a big section of text that matched word-for-word with his website was superb. If Race didn't exist those of us on the side of mainstream science would have to make him up.
457
posted on
02/22/2005 6:32:29 AM PST
by
Thatcherite
(Conservative and Biblical Literalist are not synonymous)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo; All
"Do the evo's have ANY idea how silly they look on this thread. It's hilarious!" Not nearly as funny as the creationists who continually post lies and misinformation which has been repeatedly debunked, all the while complaining of "spamming", as well as those who offer them loud hosannahs for it.
Not to mention the total refusal to retract or correct the misstatements.
458
posted on
02/22/2005 6:32:50 AM PST
by
Long Cut
(The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
To: Long Cut
How do you know anything has been debunked? Have you taken the time to study the rebuttals in depth, or are you just an evo groupie?
459
posted on
02/22/2005 6:34:59 AM PST
by
Michael_Michaelangelo
(The best theory is not ipso facto a good theory. Lots of links on my homepage...)
To: Long Cut
And what is it with all the ex-Navy guys being atheists and evolutionists? Seems every evo profile I look at reveals the person to be ex-Navy. Oh - and that person usually owns a cat.
460
posted on
02/22/2005 6:37:10 AM PST
by
Michael_Michaelangelo
(The best theory is not ipso facto a good theory. Lots of links on my homepage...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480 ... 841-843 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson