[traderrob6]

Don't you just love those questions that have a false premise at their core? Exposing the Left

[dennisw]

It's an embarrassment all ways around. One gay blogger is vicious but no dumb, he has the photos and they are Gannon's. By photos I mean it's gay guys exchanging info for hook ups

[silent_jonny]

COOPER: But using the term "reporting" implies some sort of vetting, some sort of research, some sort of -- I mean, that's called faxing or Xeroxing, if you are just lifting transcripts and putting them into an article.

But I'm sure Cooper holds a higher opinion of Dan Rather, the guy that tried to sell fiction as fact.

[Piquaboy]

The MSM will jump on any conservative like stink on you know what. They are not biased though!

[gunnedah]

I think the left has started something that should keep going. These kooks from the left that supposedly reports the news should be as closely examined and investigated as politicians. Most of them have a personal stake in government in some form or the other and most of them have lots of skeletons in their closets. I personally do not think 25% of the MSM could stand up to any scrutiny if it were done right.Lets get it on,it is time to take away their free pass and to expose them and their families personally. It seems as though lawyers,judges and news media have special privileges that the rest of us don't.

[MisterRepublican]

I have yet to see evidence that any laws were broken by the White House.

I doubt that White House Press Office runs security clearance style background checks on "journalists". If Gannon was a gay prostitute how would the White House Press Office know this if he had never been arrested for it. The background checks that are done wouldn't likely find his sexual proclivities.

But using the new standard set up by the liberals, I think a Top Secret clearance should now be required for any "journalist" who wants to ask questions at the White House.

[Loyal Buckeye]

Two questions:

Is Gannon not continuing to go by the name of Gannon?

What is the question that he asked that got the Libs' panties all bunched up?

[satchmodog9]

bump

[TexasCajun]

make that: "...Bush Friendly Reporter Formerly Known as Gannonn"

[TexasCajun]

What's all the uproar about?

A. A 'Bush-friendly' reporter is allowed into the press corp?

B. A homosexual is supporting the enemy?

C. Unqualified journalist in the White House.

Answer: A & B

(See what happens when blacks or homosexuals try to leave the proverbial democrat plantation!)

[backhoe]

 

 The Talons of Intimidation- Jeff Gannon's saga

[cricket]

"COOPER: But using the term "reporting" implies some sort of vetting, some sort of research, some sort of -- I mean, that's called faxing or Xeroxing, if you are just lifting transcripts and putting them into an article."

An amazing question from what is just one voice that speaks as part of the MSM 'collective'. . .

Let's get this straight. . .these so called journalists/reporters who dot their 'i' the same; cross their 't's. . .as they share the same paragrahs. . .we should now refer to as . . .'faxers'. . .

Like it. . .AP faxer. . .NYT's faxer. . .