Replies

The full transcript of that exchange is located here. Sanchez's time was up, so there really wasn't more to say except that Rumsfeld wanted to elaborate on an earlier point. Here's how it went, picking up from the point where Rumsfeld called Sanchez out:

RUMSFELD: ...The date on my paper here is February 14th. What's yours?

SANCHEZ: December 20th.

RUMSFELD: Not surprising there's a difference.

SANCHEZ: But the difference is different in different categories, not in the same...

HUNTER: If the gentlemen will hold on for a minute, the gentlelady's time is up, and we're going to try to knock out a few more questions here before the...

SANCHEZ: Mr. Chairman, you spoke during my time, Mr. Chairman.

RUMSFELD: I'm going to finish if I may.

HUNTER: OK, Mr. Secretary, if you can wrap up fairly quickly...

RUMSFELD: I'll like to just finish the last thought.

General Petreaus is in charge of the training and equipping of Iraqi security forces. And General Casey and General Abizaid are the ones who advice us as to what the force levels ought to be in the country.

And it appears that General Petreaus doesn't agree with them and that's fine. I'm sure other people don't agree with General Casey or General Abizaid.

But I take my advice on this subject from General Abizaid, General Casey, and General Myers and General Pace, and all four of them think we have the right size force.

UNKNOWN: Thank you.

MYERS: Well, I talked to General Petreaus last Wednesday night on this very subject, and I don't think he would disagree with the force levels we have there that the secretary mentioned earlier. I think he's in agreement with General Casey and General Abizaid.

HUNTER: I thank the gentlelady.

Not sure what Sanchez was trying to say after the exchange, but considering that she began her sentence with something as pathetic as "the difference is different in different categories", it sounds like she was just babbling in confusion.