Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An Immigration Reform Agenda for the 109th Congress
Federation for American Immigration Reform ^ | Jan2005 | F.A.I.R.

Posted on 02/18/2005 8:32:13 PM PST by 82Marine89


Reforming America's immigration policies is a matter that can no longer be swept under the rug. Decades of ineffective and irresponsible immigration policies have propelled this issue to the center stage of American politics.

Mass immigration—legal and illegal—is having an inordinate impact on every matter that is of concern to the American public:

The following legislative agenda for the 109th Congress lays out the long overdue reforms that need to be made to America's immigration policies and enforcement capabilities that will address the key concerns that the American public has about the direction of those policies.

DOMESTIC CONCERNS

Long before most people recognized the serious homeland security threats posed by U.S. immigration policies, millions of Americans recognized the impact that mass legal and illegal immigration has on their daily lives. Over the past decade, millions of American jobs in the U.S. have been lost to immigrant workers—many in the country illegally—at the cost of billions of dollars in lost wages, while billions more dollars have been taken out of the paychecks of American workers to provide social services to low-wage immigrants. According to the Wall Street investment firm Bear Stearns, between 4 and 6 million jobs in the U.S. have shifted to the underground economy in the past 15 years as a result of the massive influx of illegal aliens, far more than the number of jobs outsourced to workers in other countries.

Reform Legal Immigration Admissions Policy
U.S. immigration levels are far too high and need to be substantially reduced. The United States admits more than one million legal immigrants every year, and America's businesses claim that they cannot find qualified workers. Something is seriously wrong then with how we admit legal immigrants.

Congress must address the serious flaws in legal immigration policy.

Reform Refugee and Asylum Policy
The United States can and should honor its historic commitment to protecting people fleeing political persecution in their homelands. However, our policies in recent years have reflected political considerations in this country, rather than political oppression in the countries from which the refugees and asylees have come.

No Amnesty for Illegal Aliens
In the 108th Congress there were a plethora of proposals that would grant some form of legal status to some or all of the 10 million-plus illegal aliens estimated to be residing in the U.S. Some entailed outright amnesty, while others would turn illegal aliens into "guest workers" for an indeterminate period, presumably to be granted amnesty at some later date. Since winning re-election, President Bush has reaffirmed his goal of turning illegal aliens into guest workers. Whatever terminology is used, granting legal status to illegal aliens is amnesty for millions of people who flouted the law, and will be seen as an invitation by countless millions more people to violate our laws.

Instead, Congress should:

No New "Guest Worker" Programs
There are very few, if any, "jobs Americans won't do." In fact, there are far more jobs that Americans used to do that are now being done by illegal immigrants for lower wages and, frequently, off-the-books. Guest worker programs, as proposed by President Bush and members of Congress of both parties will cripple, if not decimate, the American middle class standard of living. Congress should:

HOMELAND SECURITY

Though terrorists have been waging a war against the United States for decades, America's war against the terrorists began in earnest when 19 foreign terrorists exploited our lax immigration policies and even laxer immigration enforcement, to launch an attack against this nation on September 11, 2001. The failures of our immigration policies were specifically spelled out in the report of the 9/11 Commission in the summer of 2004. The key recommendations of that commission must be enacted immediately by the 109th Congress.

Border Security
The first line of defense of the nation is its physical borders. In this day and age the threat to our national security does not come from conventional warfare waged by regular militaries of recognized nations, but unconventional warfare waged by terrorists loyal to ideologies that cannot be associated with a specific nation. It is essential that we take immediate steps to:

Legal Admission Security
Countless terrorists, including all 19 of the men who perpetrated the attacks of 9/11, have been admitted to our country by taking advantage of lax scrutiny of people applying for visas, and lax inspection of people entering the U.S. Given the ongoing threat to our security we must take the following steps:

Port of Entry Security
America's land, sea and air ports of entry provide a second line of defense against the admission of people who intend to carry out acts of terrorism or otherwise violate our laws.

Interior Security
Because no screening process is foolproof, greater attention must be paid to ensuring that foreign citizens comply with the terms of their admission after arriving in the U.S. In order to ensure the maximum level of compliance and provide the greatest level of defense against infiltration of sleeper cells, the following steps must be taken:

Document Security
Access to vital U.S. identity documents by terrorists and criminals is one of the glaring weaknesses in our homeland defense strategy. In order to prevent these essential documents from being used by people who threaten our security, the following measures must be adopted:

Other Security Recommendations
Congress and the Bush Administration committed themselves to implementing ALL of the recommendations set forth in the report of the 9/11 Commission. Among the additional recommendations of the Commission:




TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; aliens; congress; deportation; education; homelandsecurity; illegalimmigration; immigration; jobs; terrorists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: 82Marine89
The first thing Bush-bots do is degrade a person when they disagree with them. If you don't like my opinion, fine. I will probably never meet you in real life, so I don't need to make you happy. Second, Don't ever question my patriotism or my love of the Corps.

Firstly, I do not agree with Bush on immigration or a couple of other items. I did support him against the traitor.
Secondly, I am 62 years old, but as you should note from my handle I can still handle myself.
Thirdly, you trashed those who shed blood for their country, and so you've heard the expression, "What goes around comes around." I did not want to question your patriotism or love of the Corps, but that was the only way to wake you up to what you are saying is very un-American and wrong.
Fourthly, I am a Nam veteran and spent 6 years on an A-Team. It is individuals such as yourself who would have stopped me from marrying the lady I spent 18 years of my life searching for until I found her in Russia. Next month she will be naturalized. She almost lost her life twice due to reactions from the immunizations. She is so excited she walks around saying, "Give me liberty or give me death." Everybody loves my wife and nobody would think of her not being a blessing to America. When she applied to come her daughter had just turned 21 and was not eligible to come. We applied to bring her, and the little girl has waited 4 years and has another 1.5 years to go. Does being a Jarhead qualify you to break up families?
21 posted on 02/19/2005 10:11:58 AM PST by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
Impose a national moratorium on all permanent immigration other than spouses and minor children of U.S. citizens.
How much stricter can you get that zero immigration, legal or illegal ?


Imagine not allowing needed Ph D's, MD's, RN's, and highly qualified scientists to immigrate, and you start to see how insane individuals are on this issue. How can anyone say they love America when the very thing they are suggesting would seriously weaken her?
22 posted on 02/19/2005 10:19:17 AM PST by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
I would seriously question your 1% figure, because we are gaining one-million illegal immigrants per month, and that works out to well over your 1%.

According to CIA - The World Factbook -- United States our population growth rate is .92%

I would seriously question your one-million illegal immigrants per month figure. According to the Census Bureau between 2000 and 2004 nearly 6.1 million new immigrants (legal and illegal) arrived from abroad. New arrivals are offset by deaths and return migration among the existing immigrant population so that the net total increased by 4.3 million.

About half are illegal. That comes to about 42,000 illegals a month. You are grossly misinformed.

23 posted on 02/19/2005 11:38:31 AM PST by Once-Ler (Beating a dead horse for NeoCon America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
1st: I also do not agree with President Bush on the immigration issue.
2nd: I am not questioning the volume of testosterone flowing through your veins. I could tell from your tagline that you were Special Forces.
3rd: I have never and will never defame those who have served honorably.
4th: If you have read any of my posts on the other immigration threads, you will note that Howlin, Bayourod, Cultural Jihad, and others have labelled me a fascist, rascist, and nazi for my views on illegal immigration. I have always been pro-legal immigration. I would never have stopped you from marrying your wife. As long as a person lives his life within the boundries of the Constitution and the laws of this great nation I have no beef with them. But, should a person violate the laws or Constitution, than I have a problem.
Your wife and her daughter followed the laws of this nation, as did my grandparents, and came here legally. God bless all of them. But, should any of them come here illegally, then they should be deported.
24 posted on 02/19/2005 12:16:19 PM PST by 82Marine89 (U.S. Marines- Part of the Navy....The men's department.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc; 82Marine89

You two apparently both served this country well. You both probably agree with each other on 90% of the issues and even on immigration, I don't see a huge difference. Some differences yes, but not many. just an observation.


25 posted on 02/19/2005 5:38:08 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 82Marine89
If you have read any of my posts on the other immigration threads, you will note that Howlin, Bayourod, Cultural Jihad, and others have labelled me a fascist, rascist, and nazi for my views on illegal immigration. I have always been pro-legal immigration. I would never have stopped you from marrying your wife. As long as a person lives his life within the boundries of the Constitution and the laws of this great nation I have no beef with them. But, should a person violate the laws or Constitution, than I have a problem.
Your wife and her daughter followed the laws of this nation, as did my grandparents, and came here legally. God bless all of them. But, should any of them come here illegally, then they should be deported.


Thanks, I'm glad you clarified that. I hate illegal immigration. However, the organization in your original post obviously wants to eliminate even legal immigration, and I believe that strongly undermines the country. I would oppose them with the same ferocity as those who support illegal immigration.
26 posted on 02/19/2005 6:12:17 PM PST by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Once-Ler
Back then Immigrants didn't have free welfare,healthcare and everything else.

There was actual assimilation and respect for this nation. Today there is BiLingual education and no respect for this nations history

My ancestors came here and had no government help and learned English and got up on their own 2 feet.

27 posted on 02/21/2005 7:09:33 AM PST by M 91 u2 K (Kahane was Right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson