Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My Darling, My Blood: Million Dollar Baby
Intellectual Conservative ^ | 18 February 2005 | Nicholas Stix

Posted on 02/18/2005 1:10:19 PM PST by mrustow

If you give Million Dollar Baby half a chance, you're gonna cry.

"You're gonna cry," the ticket-seller, a Spanish lady in her late fifties, told me. And she was right.

Million Dollar Baby is about two kinds of hunger: The hunger for glory that gnaws at those who seemingly have no chance at it, and the hunger for the love that bonds a father and a daughter, even if the two are not father and daughter.

Clint Eastwood is hot again. In 2003, his movie Mystic River, in which he did not act, was up for all of the major Oscars, and won Tim Robbins an Academy Award for best supporting actor. (That Oscar may have been a payoff for Robbins' years of leftwing political agitation.) Mystic River, a murder mystery set in Boston, was good, but not as good as its press. Its script, by the usually top-notch Brian Helgeland, was full of red herrings, and contained a scene involving the suspect (Tim Robbins) that, taken in isolation was great, but which contradicted everything else we were shown about the character. Typical for Eastwood's movies, however, the acting was uniformly excellent.

During the early-to-mid 1990s, the man who learned his trade from Sergio Leone and Don Siegel was the best director in the business, turning out three masterpieces in a row: The western, Unforgiven (1992), for which he won Oscars for best director and best picture, and was nominated for best actor; the road/crime story, A Perfect World (1993), which bombed at the box office and was ignored by the Academy (Kevin Costner gave the performance of his career, but it was too late to win back his lost fans); and the story of romance and adultery, The Bridges of Madison County (1995), a commercial and critical success, which however was only nominated for best actress for Meryl Streep's revelatory performance, but which I think should have won a passel of Oscars. Pretty good, all in all, for a guy who got his start playing roustabout trail boss "Rowdy Yates" on the TV western, Rawhide, back in 1959.

After Bridges, Eastwood lost his way. He made the entertaining but lightweight Absolute Power (1997), and deteriorated to the point of the muddled Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil (also 1997). He was more effective as a moviemaker in True Crime (1999), but too old for the role of reporter "Steve Everett," in which he botched some good lines. In Million Dollar Baby, Eastwood recaptures that '90's glory, as producer, director, actor and even composer.

Baby is a boxing picture, only the fighter is a girl. With "Maggie McNamara," Hilary Swank paints the most intense portrait of a fighter since Robert DeNiro's Jake LaMotta in Raging Bull (1980). Maggie was born and raised as white trash. With her father dead, the lifelong waitress is burdened with an overweight mother, a street scum convict brother, and a sister that gets by through welfare fraud. She never had a chance. But she makes her own luck ... to a point.

Eastwood's "Frankie Dunn" is the greatest "cut man" in the business, and a sometime manager who often hurts more for his fighters than they do. A devout Catholic, though he doesn't look or preach the part, Frankie goes to mass every morning, prays for his estranged daughter and another female (dead wife? ex-wife?) every night, and grieves over an earlier boxing mishap. Frankie is a difficult man, who terrorizes his young priest with snarky metaphysical questions, to the point of provoking the young man to cuss him out, and tell him to skip mass.

Frankie: Father, that was a great sermon ... made me weep.

Father Horvak: What's confusing you this week?

Frankie: Oh, it's the same old, "one God-three God" thing.

Father Horvak: Frankie, most people figure out by kindergarten that it's about faith.
Frankie: Is it sort of like snap, crackle, and pop, all rolled into one big box?

Meanwhile, Maggie just wants a chance. Frankie tells Maggie, "I don't train girls," but she is not to be denied.

With "Scrap Iron's" help, each comes to fill the void in the other's life.

Some critics, like the Daily News' Jack Mathews, have said that Eastwood's Frankie Dunn is the performance of a lifetime. They're right. But Eastwood will almost surely lose the best actor Oscar to Jamie Foxx for Ray. (Since I have yet to see Ray, I can't say who deserves it more.) Eastwood is up for best director, and as producer, for best picture. His main competition in those categories is director Martin Scorcese, and producers Michael Mann and Graham King, all of The Aviator. (Aviator is up for eleven awards to Baby's seven; many observers think Scorcese will win based not on quality, but sentiment and memories of his superior earlier work.)

I had never seen Hilary Swank act before, but somehow I felt as if I knew her work, before I even entered the theater. All I knew of her was her pathetic Oscar acceptance speech for Boys Don't Cry (1999), when she pleaded with the world "to embrace diversity!," the winning appearance she gave a few months ago on a late night talk show (probably Letterman), and the ads for Baby. Sometimes you can tell in seconds that a performer has no talent -- think Sean Combs, Jennifer Lopez, Ben Affleck. Much more rarely, in just a moment, you can tell that a performer has it, whatever "it" is. From those promos, I knew that Hilary Swank had it.

Anyone who was old enough to know what was going on during the 1970s, beheld a colossus in the young Robert DeNiro. He was both a life force and the hungriest actor in the business. DeNiro was always challenging himself, and always willing to sacrifice more for a role than anyone else, whether it was spending weeks learning Sicilian for The Godfather Part II (1974); learning the saxophone for New York, New York (1977); or training for months before filming, and then putting on 60 pounds in the middle of filming Raging Bull, in order to play boxer Jake LaMotta, both as middleweight champ and as a fat, middle-aged, has-been. Hilary Swank, who reportedly put on 20 pounds in training for Baby, has that sort of hunger, ambition, and talent. Her ring work is every bit as good as DeNiro's (maybe better), and in and out of the ring, she will break your heart. She's a prohibitive favorite to win her second best actress Oscar. Behold the new colossus!

Morgan Freeman's one-eyed, old pug, "Eddie 'Scrap Iron' Dupris," has been like a wife to Frankie for about thirty years. Eastwood exploits Freeman both on-camera and as narrator, which is a great advantage for any movie (think Se7en and The Shawshank Redemption). As narrator, Freeman's pipes sound the worse for wear, but he still uses his voice better than anyone else in the business, managing somehow to give brilliant, clean, line readings in an even tone, yet without falling into a monotone. (Compare that to lazy George Clooney's monotone.) And Freeman has a stage presence where he can command attention, while doing "nothing." He is physically convincing as an old man who fought 109 prize fights, and wasn't retired until the age of 39. His "Scrap Iron" and Frankie trade barbs with the dark humor of survivors who have lost much, but who have not thrown in the towel. Such a dark movie requires as much humor as possible. I'm reminded of O'Neill's A Moon for the Misbegotten, and the gallows humor of the ill-fated "James Tyrone Jr." and "Josie Hogan" (the late Jason Robards and Colleen Dewhurst).

Freeman is up for best supporting actor, his fourth nomination (following Street Smart, Driving Miss Daisy, and Shawshank), and is favored to finally win it. I hope he does.

The picture has a lean, powerful screenplay by Paul Haggis (thirtysomething, EZ Streets), who does dark better than anyone, based on the stories Rope Burns, by the late F.X. Toole, himself an old cut man (and surely, like Frankie, an Irish Catholic -- Francis Xavier?).

While Million Dollar Baby was filmed in color, for much of the movie, you wouldn't know it. As shot by Tom Stern, it is a study in shadow and light. It has a powerful yet restrained score, also by Eastwood, that works on the viewer like Larry Holmes' jab, and which, like Stern's cinematography, inexplicably was not nominated for an Oscar.

Eastwood used much of the production crew that has been his mainstay for years. (He founded his own production company, Malpaso, over thirty years ago.) Thus, the editing is by Joel Cox, the production design by Henry Bumstead, and Lennie Niehaus, who used to also score Eastwood's movies, arranged and conducted his score. You've come a long way, Rowdy!

If you give Million Dollar Baby half a chance, like the ticket-seller lady said, you're gonna cry.

New York-based freelancer Nicholas Stix has written for Toogood Reports, Middle American News, the New York Post, Daily News, American Enterprise, Insight, Chronicles, Newsday and many other publications. His recent work is collected at The Critical Critic.

Email Nicholas Stix

Send this Article to a Friend



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: academyawards; boxing; boxingmovies; clinteastwood; cultureofdeath; death; greed; hilaryswank; hollywierd; martinscorsese; milliondollarbaby; morganfreeman; moviereview; murder; robertdeniro
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 last
To: mrustow
But then don't set up a soapbox to scream about movies you haven't seen.

I did not rant. All I said to the original poster was AMEN and then I was called a "movie hater".

121 posted on 02/19/2005 10:12:39 AM PST by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: baseballfanjm
You wouldn't put me down for loving the Red Sox, would you?

Yes, Absolutely. I'm a Yankee fan.

122 posted on 02/19/2005 10:14:18 AM PST by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
P.S. In about a month, it'll be out on video, and then you can rent it for only 4 or 5 bucks.

But why? Even if I was a movie buff and loved lighting, editing, and such, but don't care for the plot, why should I give my money to Hollywood. That is an endorsement that I like the story and plot. This gives Hollywood the impression and the motivation to make more movies in this genre, which I don't like.

123 posted on 02/19/2005 10:17:34 AM PST by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
Baby is a boxing picture, only the fighter is a girl. With "Maggie McNamara," Hilary Swank paints the most intense portrait of a fighter since Robert DeNiro's Jake LaMotta in Raging Bull (1980).

A minor point but the character's name is Maggie Fitzgerald.

Good point.

You will cry all right (I sure did) but I had problems with the ending. Too many irrationalities..... first and foremost why would such a character as Maggie, so full of life and fight, ask her manager and surrogate father to 'put her down'?

I think Hildy, at #119, came up with the best explanation for that.

124 posted on 02/19/2005 3:02:04 PM PST by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk; ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

I found out my parents went to see this movie. They liked it, and fell for the euthanasia bit hook line and sinker. Kept saying "Well in that situation, I agree that it was the right thing!". I told them that is how the left works, they attach their core issues to emotion in order to suck you in.

They go see about 6 movies per month, I keep telling them not to support the degenerates in Hollywood. I learned a lot about Hollywood by reading some of the testimony from the HUAC...especially Ayn Rand.

I hate that industry as much as I do the MSM. America needs a "Conservative" Hollywood......


125 posted on 02/19/2005 4:16:22 PM PST by Stellar Dendrite (I HATE socialists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: conservonator

"Hummm...I wonder haw many people who will read this and say "yah, you uptight busybodies need to get a life" were so level headed when it came to discussing Fahrenheit 911?"

LOL, I was about to respond to him and say the SAME thing. Great minds think alike ;)


126 posted on 02/19/2005 4:19:03 PM PST by Stellar Dendrite (I HATE socialists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
P.S. In about a month, it'll be out on video, and then you can rent it for only 4 or 5 bucks.

But why? Even if I was a movie buff and loved lighting, editing, and such, but don't care for the plot, why should I give my money to Hollywood. That is an endorsement that I like the story and plot. This gives Hollywood the impression and the motivation to make more movies in this genre, which I don't like.

If you weant to speak intelligently about a movie, rather than come off as a hypocritical ignoramus, you have to fork over the money and see it. Otherwise, your comments reflect only on yourself, and not on the movie.

127 posted on 02/20/2005 11:34:34 AM PST by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: stevem

You've gotta see Rocky III. It was the best Rocky since Rocky I. Except for maybe Rocky II.


128 posted on 02/20/2005 11:37:03 AM PST by Richard Kimball (It was a joke. You know, humor. Like the funny kind. Only different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball
You've gotta see Rocky III. It was the best Rocky since Rocky I. Except for maybe Rocky II.

I want to see the one where Sylvester Stallone comes to the center of the ring pushing his walker. Let's see. The villain could be the Ice Man they found in the Alps a few years past. He could melt and come to life. He will be madder than Hillary on a bad hair day because his compatriots left him there to die. A guy that tough will be hard to beat, and he will work his way to Rocky Balboa killing all his opponents because he sees in their face the guy most responsible for leaving him.

He will prove he is a villain because he will hammer the cop just about to arrest the guy that stabbed OJ's ex, so OJ's quest must go on.

The rest of it will be the usual Rocky formula.

129 posted on 02/20/2005 11:58:31 AM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
If you weant to speak intelligently about a movie, rather than come off as a hypocritical ignoramus, you have to fork over the money and see it. Otherwise, your comments reflect only on yourself, and not on the movie.

You just don't get it, do you? If I fork over the money, as you say, I am telling Hollywood that I want more movies with this type of social message which I don't agree with.

Secondly, I am not hypocritical because I'm not pretending I saw the movie and the name calling reflects on you, not me. I know what the movie is about from all of the reviews, commentary, and the hoopla, and I don't want to see it.

Thirdly, why should I listen to you to and see the film? Why does the "see the film" crowd have any more weight than the "don't see the film" crowd? Many in the "don't see the film" crowd have seen the film and don't recommend it?

130 posted on 02/22/2005 6:58:35 AM PST by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson