Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ethrane

The difference is the Red Wings has a solid shot at the Cup and weren't the over the hill gang. The Rangers paid players based on how many years ago they should have retired.

Big market teams are the ones that make absurd OFFERS which drive up the price of players both through the agents and arbitration.

The Rangers might be able to make money with a $75 mil payroll, but they can't win games with it.


222 posted on 02/19/2005 6:35:30 AM PST by discostu (quis custodiet ipsos custodes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]


To: discostu
The difference is the Red Wings has a solid shot at the Cup and weren't the over the hill gang. The Rangers paid players based on how many years ago they should have retired. Big market teams are the ones that make absurd OFFERS which drive up the price of players both through the agents and arbitration. The Rangers might be able to make money with a $75 mil payroll, but they can't win games with it.

Yeah...I guess it was the big market Islanders that threw $10+ mill to Yashin, the big market Caps who threw $11+ mill at Jagr, and the ultra-large market Carolina Hurricanes that offerred a ridiculous contract to then FA Federov frocing the Red Wings to pay him $12 mill. There's plenty of blame to go around.

And, if the Rangers can't win with a $75 mill payroll, and the owners refuse to revenue share in any meaningful way, why do they care?

Arbitration has led to the salary escalation, because the NHL restricts FA until 31.

224 posted on 02/19/2005 8:51:16 AM PST by Ethrane ("semper consolar")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson