Skip to comments.
'America would back Israel attack on Iran'
Telegraph ^
| 2/18/05
Posted on 02/18/2005 9:38:47 AM PST by areafiftyone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: areafiftyone
Good for Bush. No beating around the bush.
2
posted on
02/18/2005 9:43:44 AM PST
by
pissant
To: areafiftyone
"...And in that Israel is our ally, and in that we've made a very strong commitment to support Israel, we will support Israel if her security is threatened..."
Hey France & Germany - This is what is meant by being an "Ally". You don't cut and run when solidarity is called for.
3
posted on
02/18/2005 9:44:20 AM PST
by
j_k_l
To: pissant
One of the reasons why we love W.
4
posted on
02/18/2005 9:46:42 AM PST
by
quesera
(Let Freedom Reign!)
To: areafiftyone
My, my, my. Another euro-bed-wetting-surrender-monkey is getting nervous.
5
posted on
02/18/2005 9:46:42 AM PST
by
joedelta
(Those who long for peace must prepare for war)
To: All
Darn right. And if Israel launches, they won't be holding back because of public opinion or political correctness. In other words: enemy bad, see enemy, shoot enemy.
6
posted on
02/18/2005 9:49:25 AM PST
by
Luke21
To: Luke21
More likely the Americans do the job and blame it on the Israelis. The Israelis get blamed for everything anyway. Mission accomplished and the logistics are easier.
To: areafiftyone
Well, if we are going to support Israel on this, we may as well just do it ourselves....
Frankly it was easier the first time Israel did it....at least politically.
Back then Israel mounted up, flew the route where they were most able to move in and out either undetected or unchallenged.
Since we are militarily involved in the region, and since Israelie forces will be moving through airspace now controlled by the US, we are put in the position where we cannot claim we didn't see them, or know what they were up to. We will have given them de facto permission and assistance.
We cannot "deplore" "condemn" or give other diplomatic speak against their actions...we will be complicit in them. And so long as we are assisting Israel in this adventure, we probably should just do it ourselves....
To: areafiftyone
>>>
The remarks may have reflected Mr Bush's personal thinking on an issue causing deep concern in Washington. Moments later, Mr Bush was asked another question on Iran and appeared to return to his script - this time emphasising the need for a diplomatic effort.<<<
The press, in this case the Telegraph out of London, usually seems to think Bush makes inadvertant statements expressing his neocon values - and that he didn't mean to let them out - in other words, it was a "slip".
What they fail to realize is that they are watching a supurb poker player at work.
To: areafiftyone
Israel excercised extreme patience and control during the first Gulf War by taking incoming Scuds and allowing the US to respond on it's behalf. Now, knowing that Iranian nukes would not be able to reach the US, and that they'd be the target, restraint isn't the word I be banking on...
The IAF is getting rather restless.
10
posted on
02/18/2005 9:56:50 AM PST
by
Sax
To: areafiftyone
If we back Israel in their stopping Iran from getting Nukes we should allow them to go in and clean up the Palestinian mess once and for all.
To: areafiftyone
12
posted on
02/18/2005 9:58:33 AM PST
by
stuartcr
To: sgtbono2002
we should allow them to go in and clean up the Palestinian mess once and for all Huh? But the Palestinians are now on a course for peace! Didn't Arafat win a noble prize for his efforts? Israel is the problem, not the peace-loving Pali's.
Do I even need to put a sarcasm tag here?
13
posted on
02/18/2005 10:07:46 AM PST
by
usgator
To: areafiftyone
14
posted on
02/18/2005 10:12:22 AM PST
by
xjcsa
(She died of loneliness...loneliness and rabies...)
To: Alouette; Salem; SJackson; IAF ThunderPilot; SirLurkedalot; Mark in the Old South; ...
15
posted on
02/18/2005 10:12:26 AM PST
by
Convert from ECUSA
(tired of all the shucking and jiving)
To: areafiftyone
One of the great things about Ronald Reagan was the enemy feared calling his bluff. George Bush has built a resume that scares the enemy to death. Sometimes that fear can lead to less confrontation as apposed to a pacifist point of view that only emboldens our enemies and give them the strength to attack us. Walk softly and carry a big stick. They cannot say we wouldn't after seeing what we have done and that goes for Israel too because they too have shown it to be deadly to underestimate their desire to defend themselves. Make them shake in their evil boots.
16
posted on
02/18/2005 10:16:18 AM PST
by
TheForceOfOne
(Social Security – I thought pyramid schemes were illegal!)
To: Convert from ECUSA; Alouette
Folow up ping, and a request..anyone have any links as to how the Israeli press played up this comment?..
17
posted on
02/18/2005 10:21:26 AM PST
by
ken5050
(The Dem party is as dead as the NHL..)
To: areafiftyone
Oh man! The U.N. will have a fit if the Israelis bomb! The Eurocommies will scream bloody murder!
18
posted on
02/18/2005 10:25:14 AM PST
by
Visalia
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
19
posted on
02/18/2005 10:53:11 AM PST
by
SJackson
( Bush is as free as a bird, He is only accountable to history and God, Ra'anan Gissin)
To: areafiftyone
20
posted on
02/18/2005 11:02:13 AM PST
by
M. Espinola
(Freedom is never free!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson