Posted on 02/18/2005 8:43:47 AM PST by areafiftyone
First we can knock out Kerry, he has less of a chance than even Edwards.
As for Hitlery, the Senator from Illinois/Arkansas/New York/Massachusetts Ave. has a great chance if people forget the catalog of on-the-record lies (e.g., named after Edmund Hillary).
And if the Rats want to abandon the entire South.
And if she can get Manahattan fixer/union/mob buddy Ickes to manipulate the 2008 national vote the way he did the 2000 Senate race.
And if she can find one iota of her husband's charisma.
The fact is that around October 2007, Rat pollsters will begin to observe very saddening news about her 2008 prospects.
In the end it'll be Mark Warner.
Hillary need to distance herself from Hollywood and sodomites. She can win as a Perot economic nationalist.
I agree, if Hillary runs as an economic nationalist and dumps the sodomites, Hollywood, and Michael Moore.
I can think of one other - Kennedy - the only Senator having monument dedictated to himself from himself!
Nah, AlGore has got his man Howeeeeeeeeee in to run the DNC -- he's got it locked.
She won't get the nomination if she becomes a centrist -- the party activists are way left. Of course, she may give 'em a wink and a nod......
Sen.John Kerry (news - web sites), D-Mass., and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (news - web sites), D-N.Y., take part in a news conference on voting reform legislation Thursday, Feb. 17, 2005, on Capitol Hill.
Are you referring to the National Oldsmobile Fish Reef off Chapaquidick?
That's the point, Hillary cannot win without reigning in the radical left. She was very angry that Dean was taking the party so far to the left because she knew that it would undue all the triangulation of the Clinton years and it would be very difficult to pull the fragile coalition of fringe groups back together. She even had her Democrat leadership Council write an article that was published in the WSJ saying exactly that.
The Clinton agenda was mostly all smoke and mirrors, out of necessity. Sidney Blumenthal tried to define the agenda as the "Third Way," and got shut down. He wrote a long editorial which appeared in the Seattle Post Intelligencer, but was removed from the internet, never to be seen again. The Clintons didn't want to be defined. Hollywood and the other Leftists are falling for it this time.
He told everyone he was gonna win too. :) :) :)
Probably right. People wondered why Russert asked about the 180 after the election. We should have understood that is a signal the MSM will make a huge new "discovery" about Kerry they were "unaware" existed in '04. If he runs, and he's planning to, his traitorous past will be uncovered. He'll be destroyed by his own.
IMO, if I were the Dems, I'd knock Kerry off in '06 and install a new youthful Dem that will follow the party line without question. He's a liability and MASS is an almost lock for a Dem Senator. Doubt they'll do this since Kennedy runs MASS and sees Kerry as his only heir.
What about Hillary?
Second place?
Kerry is still wearing his JK tie in that pic. Talk about egotistical.
I actually asked Hugh Hewitt why Tim asked the question and he said 'entertainment'. Methinks you and I are closer to what will happen. Kerry, in his arrogance, does not see it. His chance was '04 where the Hate Bush theme was all they had. That will not be the case in '08 and people just don't like Kerry. Gotta run, have a great weekend...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.