Well, as anti-evolutionists are keen to point out, you cannot prove a negative. (You cannot prove that God didn't create the world, for example) But you can have enough evidence to make any rational person believe a negative has been disproved. In this case, the overwhelming evidnce (and lack of evidence to the contrary) would lead any rational person to believe that humans and dinosaurs did not co-exist.
Well then to quote you "But you can have enough evidence to make any rational person believe a negative has been disproved. In this case, the overwhelming evidnce (and lack of evidence to the contrary) would lead any rational person to believe" that there is no MISSING link, as one has never been found despite the many fraudulent attempts.
Frequent misuse does not mean it is wrong. I frequently misuse my calculator; that doesn't mean the calculator is wrong.. And apparently science has figured out that it can be inaccurate after a certain time period, and thus we know when and when not to rely on it so we're not being fooled.
How ever you are wrong if you go around touting that incorrect number on your calculator as correct
It's just irrational to believe that hundreds of thousands of scientists have for centuries been involved in a consiracy to distort evidence in order to deny the biblical account of creation.
However evolution has only been around for a about 170 years, as for your conspiracy theory, how about the lack of discourse in public schools. Secular educators refuse to even acknowledge that evolution has problems. Although one is sincere, they can be sincerely wrong.
Would one of you ignorant yahoos just once explain what is supposedly missing from the fossil record? This "missing link" thing someone taught you parrots to squawk for? Why isn't anything out of all the predicted intermediate forms we have found "the missing link?"
Why, for instance, isn't any of this stuff "the missing link?" There's something I want you to keep in mind while you're tediously going through all those things and waving them away one by one. (Remember, the Lord needs you to do it!) If it turns out that no fossil or fossil series that we could ever find can ever be "the missing link," then the lack of "the missing link" in the fossil record doesn't prove squat, does it?