Would one of you ignorant yahoos just once explain what is supposedly missing from the fossil record? This "missing link" thing someone taught you parrots to squawk for? Why isn't anything out of all the predicted intermediate forms we have found "the missing link?"
Why, for instance, isn't any of this stuff "the missing link?" There's something I want you to keep in mind while you're tediously going through all those things and waving them away one by one. (Remember, the Lord needs you to do it!) If it turns out that no fossil or fossil series that we could ever find can ever be "the missing link," then the lack of "the missing link" in the fossil record doesn't prove squat, does it?
Would one of you ignorant yahoos just once explain what is supposedly missing from the fossil record? This "missing link" thing someone taught you parrots to squawk for? Why isn't anything out of all the predicted intermediate forms we have found "the missing link?"
Why, for instance, isn't any of this stuff "the missing link?" There's something I want you to keep in mind while you're tediously going through all those things and waving them away one by one. (Remember, the Lord needs you to do it!) If it turns out that no fossil or fossil series that we could ever find can ever be "the missing link," then the lack of "the missing link" in the fossil record doesn't prove squat, does it?
Actually you are the www.yahoo.com. YOu have no idea what you are talking about. The missing link is a transitional form of a species, a mouse with wings that is turing into a bat for example. It is some species that is supposedly mutating into another species. If as you believe that evolution took place over millions of years and things evolve there should be millions of fossils of transitional species. However there has not be one fossil found of the millions and millions discovered and dont think that evolutionists have not been looking. Every fossil today appears as a distinct species because thats all that was around during the flood