Posted on 02/17/2005 9:55:43 AM PST by 26lemoncharlie
Yippee!!!!
Now, if we could put that judge in charge of the Terri Schiavo case, I could get a good night's sleep for a change.
Praise the Lord!
Bttt
Thanks for the ping! This is awesome!! Praise the Lord indeed! He is our advocate, intercessor, counselor and helper! :o)
About friggin time, now they should go after that anti-Christian SOB district attorney, Charles Ehrlich, who pushed these so-called "hate crime" charges against the Christian protestors. They should sue him in federal court, under the civil rights act (42 USC 1983) both in his capacity as DA and individually as a private citizen. And when they win, they can take his home and throw the dirt bag out onto the street.
--Boot Hill
ONLY problem is the message has already been sent that
Christians are accepted in Philly only if they are polite and remain behind closed doors, and do not offend anybody.
Problem is Scripture is still considered Hate Speech and
Christianity a Hate Group. Until PA removes Sexual Orientation from their protected class status the confusion will remain. I see nothing to celebrate in this
dropping of charges -except in that the good people wrongly
charged no longer face prison.The fundamental problem
remains unchanged.
It isn't just CHRISTIANS, it's anyone on the RIGHT!
Deo gratias.
SECOND: About friggin time, now they should go after that anti-Christian SOB district attorney, Charles Ehrlich, who pushed these so-called "hate crime" charges against the Christian protestors. They should sue him in federal court, under the civil rights act (42 USC 1983) both in his capacity as DA and individually as a private citizen. And when they win, they can take his home and throw the dirt bag out onto the street.
Prosecutorial Immunity would prevent that (sad, I know) BUT, the city is still liable for "malicious prosecution" under that same code. There's also the matter of conspiracy between the prosecutor(s) and the homo's from DOJ who attended the rally and insisted on this prosecution. Hmmmm....come to think of it, Title 18 USC 241, "conspiracy against rights" trumps both judicial and prosecutorial immuunity, last I heard. There's a case like that out of San Diego where a judge is/was being prosecuted criminally. Good luck getting DOJ to prosecute their own on this though.
A thank you to all of those who prayed for us and for a just outcome of the case.
Also, thank you to all who wrote letters, made phone calls, and told others about what was happening.
I really appreciate it!
Thanks You,
Dennis Green
http://www.lifeandlibertyministries.com
I'm curious. Was the ACLU ever approached about this? Did the ACLU ever offer to protect your free speech rights? I am assuming this is not the kind of free speech the ACLU would be interested in protecting.
Amen.
O, and pass the ammunition.
I think they should sue. Not out of vengence, but out of the desire to prevent other people from being falsely prosecuted.
Maybe eventually, but the wheels of justice are slow. These people were arrested, jailed, had to make bail(?), were threatened, and incurred legal fees. All unjustly. The system shouldn't have allowed that to happen.
The system failed when they were arrested. The system failed when the arraignment judge didn't throw the case out. The system failed when the prosecutors decided to pursue the case. The system failed when the first judge ordered them to stand trial.
That's way too many failures.
Now how about those court cost and attorney's fee's?False arrest?
All I can do is repeat -
WOO HOO!!
And thank God.
Hope is not lost.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.