Skip to comments.
My 'Million Dollar' Answer: Why would a conservative criticize Clint Eastwood's latest work?
The Wall Street Journal Opinion Journal ^
| February 17, 2005
| Michael Medved
Posted on 02/16/2005 9:11:41 PM PST by quidnunc
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-208 next last
1
posted on
02/16/2005 9:11:42 PM PST
by
quidnunc
To: quidnunc
Raging Bull meets Raging Baloney
2
posted on
02/16/2005 9:14:24 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
To: quidnunc
My brother, who is a disgusting liberal, hated this movie. He is an occupational therapist and said that the way the character felt was common for those with spinal cord injuries AT FIRST and then their attitude usually changes.
To: quidnunc
Why would they criticize? Because some think it is better to live as a non-functioning brain-dead vegetable than to die with some dignity.
4
posted on
02/16/2005 9:17:15 PM PST
by
richmwill
To: quidnunc
Medved almost single handed has dealt a death blow to this pitiful deceitful movie.
5
posted on
02/16/2005 9:19:34 PM PST
by
Andy from Beaverton
(I only vote Republican to stop the Democrats)
To: NormsRevenge
Where were these liberal idiots when Mel Gibson was getting crucified? Oh thats right they love killing babies and Hate God? They go after the wrong people all the time with such hatred.
6
posted on
02/16/2005 9:19:35 PM PST
by
Brimack34
To: quidnunc
A relative of mine, who happens to lean left, saw the movie the other day and expressed outrage over the ending. She said that she had no idea the movie would conclude in such a way and felt mislead. This relative also said that had she known about the twist at the end she would never had seen the movie.
7
posted on
02/16/2005 9:19:51 PM PST
by
This Just In
(In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king.)
To: quidnunc
Someone show me the law that says that the media has to comply with the wishes of Hollywood and keep key plot details of movies a secret. I sure as heck wish someone had told me that chick in the Crying Game was a dude, that's for sure.
8
posted on
02/16/2005 9:22:03 PM PST
by
mcg1969
To: richmwill
Because some think it is better to live as a non-functioning brain-dead vegetable than to die with some dignity.Those same people believe that laying around in your own gurgle goo is similar to "living a productive life".
9
posted on
02/16/2005 9:22:34 PM PST
by
BigSkyFreeper
(Smoke free since January 16, 2005)
To: quidnunc
Another good one from Michael Medved.
10
posted on
02/16/2005 9:24:28 PM PST
by
Ciexyz
(I use the term Blue Cities, not Blue States. PA is red except for Philly, Pgh & Erie)
To: mcg1969
LOL!!!!!
Just as I knew what was to become of the female boxer(I didn't waste my dime on the flick), I knew beforehand about the chick/dude in The Crying Game. Never spent my hard earned money on that movie either.
11
posted on
02/16/2005 9:25:20 PM PST
by
This Just In
(In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king.)
To: quidnunc
The movie's theme is morally reprehensible. And as a disabled person, I resent the message my life isn't equal to the worth of people who aren't disabled because I can't do all of the things they can. I am entitled to the pursuit of happiness as much as they are. What passes for liberal compassion these days is quick and merciful death to those society deems too burdensome - and not the picture of perfect health. That's the message of
Million Dollar Baby and no amount of deceptive bait and switch advertising will conceal it. Michael Medved has earned the right to say what he thinks without fear or favor. It has nothing to with Clint Eastwood's politics or party affiliation or anything extrinsic to the movie. The movie just plain sucks.
Denny Crane: "There are two places to find the truth. First God and then Fox News."
12
posted on
02/16/2005 9:26:18 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: conservative cat
I have a friend who was a hospital chaplain. She was talking with a young father who was paralyzed. He focused totally on what he couldn't do anymore for the young daughter that adored him. She focused on the fact that he could be the willing ear when no one else could be bothered. I know I'm saying this badly but she made him realise that he may be paralyzed but he had love and time for his daughter. He saw that he was indeed needed and VERY important.
13
posted on
02/16/2005 9:29:04 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
("Are you cops? FBI" bad guy, "I'm currently unemployed" Tony Almeida of 24)
To: Andy from Beaverton
Medved almost single handed has dealt a death blow to this pitiful deceitful movie. What kind of box-office has it done?
To: richmwill
Why would they criticize? Because some think it is better to live as a non-functioning brain-dead vegetable than to die with some dignity.Oh give me a friggin' break. The boxer becomes a quadrapalegic, not a vegetable. Either you just live to insult people by lumping the brain dead with the disabled or you just don't know what the heck you're talking about.
15
posted on
02/16/2005 9:29:44 PM PST
by
mcg1969
To: quidnunc
First, I agree with Medved that there is nothing subtle about the message of "Million Dollar Baby." The film evokes sympathy for a character who commits assisted suicide, and, in doing so, sends a message that quadraplegics have no life to live--a message which, by all scientific standards, flies in the face of reality. Surprisingly, most people who undergo such tragedies soon recover a lust for life and, in empirical research, demonstrate higher happiness scores than lottery winners. Christopher Reeve was a living example.
So, I completely reject the message of the film.
On the other hand, Eastwood is without doubt one of the most skilled film directors in Hollywood today. He has had his share of duds (i.e., Bloodwork), but within the past decade, he has directed some of the most mature and outstanding examples of cinema in recent memory. "Unforgiven" and "Mystic River" are particular standouts.
The cinematic craftsmanship of "Million Dollar Baby" is top notch in every respect. Most outstanding of all is the cinematography and lighting of Tom Stern, who really hits his stride with this film. Eastwood's musical score is subtle and just right. With the exception of Jay Baruchel, who overplays the mental retarded kid, the acting is superb in every sense. Both Swank and Eastwood display the apex of their talents on-screen--and, consider Eastwood's acting history, that's saying a lot. The editing is well-paced. For the most part, the writing is crisp and original, perhaps with the exception of the almost campy family of Swank's character.
It is possible to distinguish the craftsmanship of a film from the message of the film. If I were to grade "Million Dollar Baby" on ethics, it gets an F. But on filmmaking, it deserves an A.
16
posted on
02/16/2005 9:32:13 PM PST
by
bdeaner
To: eddie willers
Weekend Box Office Actuals (U.S.) - FRom Yahoo Movies
Feb 11 - 13 weekend
This Wk |
Last Wk |
Title |
Dist. |
Weekend Gross |
Cumulative Gross |
Rlse Wks |
# of Theaters |
1 |
- |
Hitch |
SONY |
$43,142,214 |
$43,142,214 |
1 |
3575 |
2 |
1 |
Boogeyman |
SONY/GEMS |
$10,235,785 |
$32,768,501 |
2 |
3052 |
3 |
3 |
Are We There Yet? |
SONY |
$8,236,727 |
$61,253,768 |
4 |
2810 |
4 |
5 |
Million Dollar Baby |
WB |
$7,447,212 |
$44,948,277 |
9 |
2035 |
5 |
- |
Pooh's Heffalump Movie |
BV |
$5,805,559 |
$5,805,559 |
1 |
2529 |
6 |
2 |
The Wedding Date |
UNIV |
$5,513,065 |
$19,421,375 |
2 |
1704 |
7 |
4 |
Hide and Seek |
FOX |
$5,408,477 |
$43,410,777 |
3 |
2525 |
8 |
6 |
The Aviator |
M'MAX |
$4,671,646 |
$82,323,907 |
9 |
2196 |
9 |
8 |
Sideways |
FOX SEARCH |
$4,472,135 |
$52,777,699 |
17 |
1619 |
10 |
7 |
Meet the Fockers |
UNIV |
$3,456,245 |
$269,946,550 |
8 |
1883 |
17
posted on
02/16/2005 9:32:40 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
To: quidnunc
I know someone who is very sensitive to the subject of suicide. Thanks to Michael Medved's ranting about this movie, I was able to warn her about the theme.
She still saw the movie, but was VERY glad that I told her about it.
To: mcg1969
Someone show me the law that says that the media has to comply with the wishes of Hollywood and keep key plot details of movies a secret.It's not a law -- it's an issue of consideration. I don't like knowing too much about a movie before I see it. Even trailers show too much, in my opinion.
I don't think portrayal of an issue equals advocacy. If a movie promotes healthy debate about a touchy subject, fine. Simply watching a movie or seeing something objectionable is not going to change my principles. Clint Eastwood shouldn't be vilified for this fine film.
19
posted on
02/16/2005 9:32:53 PM PST
by
FoxInSocks
("It's fun to shoot some people." -- James Mattis, Lt. Gen., USMC)
To: DJ MacWoW
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-208 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson