Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US warned of east-west oil bidding war
Financial Times(subscription) ^

Posted on 02/16/2005 6:15:40 AM PST by Alex Marko

The head of ChevronTexaco on Tuesday called on the US government to build growing competition for Middle East oil with Asian consumers into a new national energy policy, or risk harming future economic growth.

Dave O'Reilly, chairman and chief executive of the second largest US oil and gas group, pointed to the closer ties between consumers such as China and India and Middle East producers at a time when cheap-to-find oil was becoming more scarce.

"We're seeing the beginnings of a bidding war for Middle Eastern oil between east and west," said Mr O'Reilly in a keynote address to a Houston energy conference. "[And we're seeing] the beginning of alliances between Asian entities and Middle East entities for the long term," he said. "It's very important that our government recognise that."

Mr O'Reilly said greater access to energy had become "a strategic imperative" for Asia, which had become a far larger importer of oil and gas than north America, where US imports were countered by domestic production and output from Canada and Mexico.

National oil companies, notably those from China and India, have become far more active in pursuing overseas assets. The Middle East still offers some of the lowest exploration and production costs, and one of the shortest transport routes to the main Asian markets.

US companies also face political difficulties in some Middle East markets, despite their recent success in the award of new exploration licences in Libya following the lifting of sanctions.

While companies such as ChevronTexaco and its larger rival ExxonMobil are investing billions of dollars to develop Qatar's natural gas fields, they are effectively barred from the even larger resources in neighbouring Iran, a major supplier to India.

Mr O'Reilly also used his speech to make the clearest call to date from the head of a major oil company for a comprehensive US energy policy which encompassed environmental, national security and trade issues. "A constructive national discussion would bring a better understanding of energy issues, particularly to the general public."

"The time when we could count on cheap oil and even cheaper natural gas is clearly ending," he said, adding that a shortage of gas had led some industry to relocate from the US, while higher energy and transport costs could lead to a shift in consumer spending patterns.

President George W. Bush is expected to make his third attempt to push an energy bill through Congress, following disagreements over the proposed level of subsidies to energy producers on previous attempts.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia
KEYWORDS: china; economy; energy; globalism; oil; us

1 posted on 02/16/2005 6:15:40 AM PST by Alex Marko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alex Marko

I said about six months ago on FR that growing demand from East Asia was what was permanently driving up oil prices and I was soundly ridiculed..


2 posted on 02/16/2005 6:19:50 AM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

who in the world ridiculed you? Its only logical that oil would be driven up by demand...especially with china's rapid growth.


3 posted on 02/16/2005 6:21:13 AM PST by Alex Marko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alex Marko; AntiGuv
The free market competition doesn't cut it anymore?

Sorry to hear people did that to you, AntiGuv. There is a "hide your head in the sand" element on FR. Asian demand is driving up steel prices as well.

4 posted on 02/16/2005 6:28:13 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Marko; Destro

I don't remember their names but I do remember it was two of them and the thread was about a polling analysis. The topic turned to rising oil/gas prices at which point I briefly discussed the impact of sharply rising Chinese demand and that we'd have to get used to a 'new normal' when it comes to oil. All of a sudden someone went off on me about that & someone else chimed in. I was just like, what the .. ??!?


5 posted on 02/16/2005 6:34:09 AM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

any position that does not tow "the party line" will get slammed.


6 posted on 02/16/2005 7:11:07 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Destro

As well as concrete.


7 posted on 02/16/2005 7:54:49 AM PST by Roccus (Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Destro

What is the "party line?" That increased demand in Asia does not drive oil prices? LOL


8 posted on 02/16/2005 7:57:16 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
The party line back then was that oil prices would go down once Iraq was stabilized.
9 posted on 02/16/2005 8:03:39 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson