Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Md. considers surcharge on mammoth SUVs ($750)
Bakersfield Californian ^ | 2/15/05 | AP

Posted on 02/15/2005 8:41:50 PM PST by NormsRevenge

ANNAPOLIS, Md. (AP) - Driving a super-sized sport utility vehicle on Maryland roads would cost $750 more a year under a measure being considered by state lawmakers.

Delegate Bill Bronrott is promoting the registration renewal surcharge for owners of SUVs that weigh more than 6,000 pounds.

"This bill is ... about the largest, heaviest passenger vehicles that are the least fuel efficient and the most toxic to our air, land and water," the Democrat told a House committee hearing Tuesday.

SUVs covered by the legislation include the Hummer H2, Cadillac Escalade ESV, Lincoln Navigator and the GMC Yukon XL.

"They pose a highway safety hazard, and they disproportionately beat up our roads and bridges," said Bronrott, who acknowledged that the bill as written may not survive in the legislature.

Automobile dealers oppose an increase.

Maryland owners of vehicles over 3,700 pounds currently pay a renewal fee of $180 every two years, compared to a fee of $128 for vehicles under 3,700 pounds.

The state doesn't keep records of how many residents own SUVs weighing more than 6,000 pounds.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: considers; environment; mammoth; maryland; surcharge; suvs; taxes; transportation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 02/15/2005 8:41:52 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Why stop there?


2 posted on 02/15/2005 8:47:05 PM PST by Dallas59 (Bush said the "F" word 27 times January 20th, 2005!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

While I don't give a hoot about who drives what.

The fact remains that 60,000 pound Tractor Trailers do 80%+ of the damage to any road. The only way to fix that without charging EVERYONE is to sock it to folks that make no difference but that the state "feels" that they do.


3 posted on 02/15/2005 8:47:06 PM PST by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

They mention all the luxury ones, but ignore the ordinary Suburbans and Expeditions, not to mention all those environmentally-identical full-size pickup trucks.


4 posted on 02/15/2005 8:47:17 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
We need to link this to the mileage tax thread.

In this case you get taxed for driving a gas guzzling vehicle. In the other you get taxed because you are driving a fuel efficient vehicle.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1343593/posts

5 posted on 02/15/2005 8:48:06 PM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

The expedition has been killed by Ford I believe, due to slow sales. For some reason , the Govt. thinks it is smarter than the people. Each person knows which car is best for him/her, the govt. should butt out of the decision making process.


6 posted on 02/15/2005 9:00:08 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I would like to see someone design a muscle car with some technologies to improve fuel economy without sacrificing peak power. A V8 which used variable delayed intake closure and which could switch between 'normal' and 'compound' mode operation could probably yield energy efficiency at moderate power levels that was better than that of conventional smaller engines without sacrificing much if anything in the way of peak power capability.

Although the added weight of such cars would likely prevent them from getting as good fuel economy as a Honda Civic, they could nonetheless be much better than most of the SUVs on the road today. Given that I suspect many SUV buyers really want muscle cars, this would thus be a change for the better.

7 posted on 02/15/2005 9:01:18 PM PST by supercat (Better to have egg on one's face than blood on one's hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

Just like a casino, the State always comes out ahead.......


8 posted on 02/15/2005 9:02:08 PM PST by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Blue state Illinois already has a $175 surcharge and there's no getting around it. I thought if I bought one in Missouri I wouldn't have to pay it but if it's registered and licensed in Illinois - I still pay it.
9 posted on 02/15/2005 9:05:55 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Is this America? This is the kind of crap you expect in socialist country populated by pin-dicks and airheads (like France).
10 posted on 02/15/2005 9:10:34 PM PST by lotusblos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The DemonRAT controlled legislature is doing this to
embarrass a Republican governor and rip off more
money from the middle class. They want to show the
governor that his veto counts for nothing. So the
middle/working class of Maryland suffers. The DemonRATs of the Maryland legislature are hoping that all those who
voted for the Robert Ehrlich will get the message and vote for a Democrat next time or else more weird onerous taxes will be put in place next year at the next legislative session. (They also are doing this because they hate GW Bush and this is the only way they can lash out at him.) If it were not for Baltimore, Montgomery Co., Prince Georges Co. and Howard County Maryland would solidly Republican.


11 posted on 02/15/2005 9:15:07 PM PST by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

"They pose a highway safety hazard, and they disproportionately beat up our roads and bridges,"

Oh, well then.
I'm assuming my fair state will be outlawing semis, buses and motorhomes too, right?
I know I feel much "safer" then.




12 posted on 02/15/2005 9:15:36 PM PST by Salamander (Some are born to sweet delight; some are born to endless night......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
If they could produce data that show that these vehicles tear-up roads worse than lighter vehicles than the tax may not be a bad idea.
13 posted on 02/15/2005 9:15:47 PM PST by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Why is my home state so screwed up?


14 posted on 02/15/2005 9:15:58 PM PST by Vision (The New York Times...All the news to fit a one world government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision

Democrats.
Any more questions?...:)


15 posted on 02/15/2005 9:18:34 PM PST by Salamander (Some are born to sweet delight; some are born to endless night......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lotusblos

---Is this America? This is the kind of crap you expect in socialist country populated by pin-dicks and airheads (like France).---

Like Bill Bronrott, Democrat.


16 posted on 02/15/2005 9:20:05 PM PST by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

It's those humongous dumpster trucks that are tearing up the highways.


17 posted on 02/15/2005 9:22:49 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
Umm I don't think so. I see them everywhere - they sell like hotcakes. Perhaps you are thinking of the Excursion.

The expedition has been killed by Ford I believe, due to slow sales. For some reason , the Govt. thinks it is smarter than the people. Each person knows which car is best for him/her, the govt. should butt out of the decision making process.

18 posted on 02/15/2005 9:46:37 PM PST by monkapotamus (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Can I register the Sherman tank that I bought last weekend at the Army-Navy Surplus Sale? My wife wants to use it as a grocery-getter. I asked her if she'd prefer a Hummer, and she slapped me.


19 posted on 02/15/2005 9:48:32 PM PST by scottybk ("Pure democracy is 2 tigers and a lamb voting on what to eat for lunch." Benj. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
This certainly sounds like a "bill of attainder" designed to punish a group of people for simply owning a specific kind of vehicle. The U.S. Constitution forbids a "bill of attainder" because it amounts to punishment by legislative act without "due process".
20 posted on 02/15/2005 10:12:41 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson