Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Glenn

Journalists should be required to abide the same laws as everyone else. I don't have any protection from naming sources if ordered by the courts and nether do you. Why should journalists have the 'right' to disobey court orders of disclosure?


37 posted on 02/15/2005 8:25:01 AM PST by RetroWarrior ("We count it death to falter, not to die")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: RetroWarrior
What makes the whole thing preposterous is that there is no such thing as a "journalist" in a strictly legal sense. There is no licensing board for journalists, and no means of separating a "good" journalist from a "bad" one in any objective manner.

If such a "journalistic immunity" were ever enshrined in law, then any person could avoid testifying in any legal matter simply by posting a story on the internet about the case in question and calling himself a journalist.

40 posted on 02/15/2005 8:28:13 AM PST by Alberta's Child (I'm not expecting to grow flowers in the desert.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson