You are picking out the stupid gov. regulations. If you reread my post I said there was a fine line between going to far with regulations. I agree the gov't has gone too far in their regulations. However in every regulatory category you cite I would not want to be without any of them. Anarchy would result.
Yes, I've heard that claim before. I believe that is why the government is looking more and more into the Anarchy that is the Internet. Not enough government control.
I am willing to live with a lot more anarchy and a lot less nanny state.
Stupid? Reducing pollution is stupid? Isn't that the goal? Or is the unintended consequences stupid?
No, what is stupid is sending money to Washington and expecting something intelligent to happen.
My gawd man Washington is filled with government employees. You could move a small family of Llamas into the place and raise the aggregate I.Q. level by two points.
How can anything good come from a place with such inhabitants?