Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: superiorslots
"However in every regulatory category you cite I would not want to be without any of them. Anarchy would result."

Yes, I've heard that claim before. I believe that is why the government is looking more and more into the Anarchy that is the Internet. Not enough government control.

I am willing to live with a lot more anarchy and a lot less nanny state.

356 posted on 02/15/2005 1:05:17 PM PST by Mad Dawgg (French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawgg
I am willing to live with a lot more anarchy and a lot less nanny state.

When you're overzealousness leads to treason by putting a weakened nation at risk, there I have to draw the line. The government is in a good many things - but often times because businesses won't do the right thing. Slavery is a massive example of this. And it was protested as loudly. Now that business has found it's equivelent in .37 an hour slaves in china, the fight has sprouted anew with all the same arguments and deceptions. There is nothing new under the sun and addicts will not be constrained.

363 posted on 02/15/2005 1:12:27 PM PST by Havoc (Reagan was right and so was McKinley. Down with free trade. Hang the traitors high)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson