<< Fine. I'm open minded.
You've made an assertion. >>
Wrong.
I have simply reported.
<< Please provide your conclusive evidence. >>
It is not "mine."
I began my search -- and I remain -- absolutely objective.
I have no dog in this fight.
The evidence simply exists -- and is as accessible to you as to me -- as to anyone who starts as a blank slate.
If you can do that you may be informed.
If, on the other hand, you have predetermined the outcome -- and are looking only for the appearance of "evidence" to support said predetermination -- there is plenty of that, too.
If the Gore/Cli'ton "administration" -- which created every one of this "investigation's" fantasies, delusions and illusions -- was expert at anything at all, it was at shuckin' and jivin' and smoke and mirrors!
At all of that -- in all of Human History -- it knows no peer.
And nor has any gang ever left behind it more smoked and mirrored, shucked and jived!
Just as I thought. No evidence.
YOU have made a bald assertion that TWA800 was brought down by a "walk on bomb" and I have challenged you to produce it. If, and when you do, I will gladly examine it. I am not going to do YOUR research for you. I have already researched this subject and my postings on FR have been cited elsewhere.
If the Clinton's were so omnipotent how is that they are still not in office?