Posted on 02/14/2005 6:10:20 PM PST by pissant
NEW YORK To the surprise of no one, the saga of former White House correspondent James D. Guckert, also known as Jeff Gannon, took center stage at a briefing conducted by White House spokesman Scott McClellan today.
Gannon/Guckert quit his post at an obscure Web site, Talon News, Tuesday night after bloggers exposed the fact that he had been working under an alias and had possible links to sex-oriented Web sites. Questions have emerged about how and why the White House allowed the reporter to attend briefings and even ask President Bush a very friendly question at his recent press conference. (See previous E&P Online story.)
McClellan admitted today that he knew that "Jeff Gannon" was not the reporter's real name. Yet at numerous televised press briefings he addressed him as "Jeff."
Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) today asked McClellan to immediately release all documents related to what the White House knew about "Gannon," and when they knew it.
From the transcript of today’s briefing:
Q: Jeff Gannon. How did he get a White House pass, or what kind of credentials did he have?
McClellan: Just like anyone else who comes to the White House.
Q: Hard pass?
McClellan: No, he had never applied for a hard pass. He had a daily pass. I think he's been coming for --
Q: Was he coming for --
McClellan: Hang on. I think he's been coming for more than two years now.
Q: Under what name?
McClellan: Sorry?
Q: Under what name?
McClellan: Well, you have to get cleared. You have to -- just like anybody else that comes to the White House, you have to have your full name, your Social Security number, and your birth date. So you have to be cleared just like anybody else.
Q: So he was being cleared under James Guckert, or whatever his name is?
McClellan: My understanding, yes.
Q: OK, and how did he get picked to get a question asked at the last news conference?
McClellan: He didn't. The president didn't have a list. The president didn't -- he was in the briefing room. There are assigned seats in the briefing room. We didn't do any assigning of seats, and the president worked his way through the rows, and called on people as he came to them. He doesn't know who he is.
Q: Were you aware that he had another name?
McClellan: Was I aware? I had heard that. I had heard that, yes, recently.
Q: But did you know during all this time that he really wasn't Jeff Gannon?
McClellan: I heard at some point, yes -- previously.
Q: As Press Secretary, what do you think about this whole --
McClellan: Well, like I said -- what do I think about it? Well, let me explain a few things. First, as the press secretary, I don't think it's the role of the press secretary to get into picking or choosing who gets press credentials. Also, I don't think it's the role of the press secretary to get into being a media critic, and I think there are very good reasons for that. I've never inserted myself into the process. He, like anyone else, showed that he was representing a news organization that published regularly, and so he was cleared two years ago to receive daily passes, just like many others are. The issue comes up -- it becomes, in this day and age, when you have a changing media, it's not an easy issue to decide or try to pick and choose who is a journalist. And there -- it gets into the issue of advocacy journalism. Where do you draw the line? There are a number of people who cross that line in the briefing room.
And, as far as I'm concerned, I would welcome the White House Correspondents Association, if they have any concerns or issues that they want to bring to my attention, they know my door is open and I'll be glad to discuss these issues with them. I have an open dialogue with the Correspondents Association. No one's ever brought such an issue to my attention, in my -- during my time as being press secretary. And you all cover the briefing room on a regular basis. You know that there are a number of people in that room that express their points of view, and there are people in that room that represent traditional media, they represent talk radio, they represent -- they're columnists, and they represent online news organizations.
Q: Was the White House aware at all -- was the White House aware -- was the White House aware at all about the online Web sites that he was linked to?
McClellan: No. This has only come to my attention through the news reports, just a few reporters calling in.
My understanding was, when he started coming to the White House about two years ago, the staff asked to see that it -- that he represented a news organization that published regularly. And they showed that, so he was cleared and has been cleared ever since based on that time.
And this is just now something that's come to my attention more recently because it's been an issue raised in some media reports.
Wow, what a scandal. This is the best the MSM can do?
So. now the media want the WH to tighten up on issuing press passes? I'd certainly be glad to pull a few passes if it were up to me! :^)
Are we supposed to care about this?
Only as yet another example of the scum-bag lefties that the Bush admin has to put up with.
In other words, he wrote under a pen name. Anyone who does so has their taxes and such done under their real name, but they are known to everyone else at large--on and off the page--by that pen name (unless they introduce themselves under their real name, for example).
I was open to this being some kind of scandal but it's just another example of the press trying to make a huge deal out of nothing at all.
I guess when these folks discuss Huckleberry Finn they don't refer to it being written by Mark Twain.
But then again, MSM and hypocrisy are pretty much synonymous anyway!
That's what I'm wondering about. The media eexpect us to care about this? They don't have enough to build the molehill, let alone the mountain they're attempting.
Sheesh. A perfect example of trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill.
This is pathetic.
Truly amazing that the whores of the political left have no more interest than attempting to create a scandal.
"whores" may be more appropriate here than intended. "Jeff Gannon" either was... or moonlighted... as a prostitute. How Scott McClellan knew this prostitute, and how a "news service" that was only a few days old got White House press credentials -- and how the person called "Jeff Gannon" slipped through routine background checks are serious national security issues, not partisan political ones.
This is at least the second or third time in the last few weeks routine background checks have failed to notice glaring problems with people close to the center of the administration.
How's things over at Senator Lautenberg's office?
It's part of McClellan's job to be aquainted with the names of press members. As he said, he's not part of the press selection process. You're trying to make a mountain out of a molehill now.
Did you even read the transcript? Guckert applied for a pass using his real name.
Excellent.
Do you think all those press prima donnas are using their real names? I mean, isn't "Peter Jennings" a stage name? He may not be a WH reporter, but you get the idea.
I would like to ask Scott if he knew that Campbell Brown was the daughter of a convicted felon who was also very much connected to the Louisiana DEMOCRAT PARTY. That is a hell of a lot closer to a campaign than Jeff Gannon!
If these creeps want to go down this road I'm willing to "help" them!
Let's also discuss David Gregory's wife donating to the Democrat's campaign. I know there are others I will need to check my files.
Anyone else feel free to add to the list of press connections to the DEMOCRATS!
Terry Moran of ABC has a sister, Margaret Zwisler, who is a Democrat activist, Clinton crony and was involved in scuttling the nomination of Linda Chavez for Labor Secretary.
Zwisler called the FBI and dropped a dime on Chavez , apparently at the urging of George Stephanopoulos and Neil Eggleston, a Clinton lawyer.
Chavez claimed that Zwisler was a liar.
But, Terry Moran apparently has no conflict and is given free reign to file his nightly hit pieces from the briefing room.
I find that connection much more disturbing than anything Gannon did.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.