Posted on 02/13/2005 10:35:23 PM PST by nickcarraway
Democrats sat in rapt attention as their king, former President Bill Clinton, pounded away on why his political party was anything but toast.
To cheers and hosannas, Clinton told the thousands at the National Building Museum last Thursday night that things weren't as bad for Democrats as the media and Republicans would have the general public believe. But that the party needed to learn a few lessons from its losses of late. One of them was unity. He told the adoring crowd that Democrats needed to support Howard Dean, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and the state parties.
No mention of Sen. John Kerry, who shared the dais with Clinton, and who has been busily working to elevate himself to leader of the opposition nationally. Kerry is said by advisers to have been surprised that Clinton did not highlight him as a party leader to be respected and supported.
But perhaps most telling about Clinton's comments, which were warmly received, was the lack of anything new compared to his remarks at prior DNC functions pre- or post-November election. "He has said this before in just about every Democratic Party setting he's attended," says a Democratic National Committee member. "I've heard this speech ten times in the past couple of years. There is nothing new, and it's unfortunate that he keeps giving it, because it's clear that our leaders aren't listening."
That may a reference to the open warfare that Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi have been waging against Dean in the past couple of months. While the three party leaders did sit down last Thursday, Reid in particular has told anyone who will listen that Dean is not the leader of the Democratic Party. Instead, Reid says, the party's operation will be a shared responsibility, with Dean essentially reporting to Reid, Pelosi, and other senior elected officials.
"There are still so many doubts about Dean that that's the only thing Reid can say to allay concerns," says a Democratic Senate leadership source. "Dean is not the guy everyone wants. He has the backing of the state parties, but he's going to have to line up with the rest of the party leadership here in D.C."
WITH THE ABSENCE OF A STRONG party head, Reid has been elbowing his way through to at least the head of the line with Dean and Pelosi, while at the same time attempting to body block Kerry from standing with them. Reid has privately ridiculed Kerry's outreach to British Prime Minister Tony Blair for advice on opposition party building, according to Senate staffers, and has insisted that the Democratic Party rally around him against what he perceives as GOP attacks against him on the Internet and in fundraising letters.
Reid attended a small White House dinner ten days ago and privately but pointedly asked the President to pull back his attack dogs. Bush apologized to Reid, saying he had nothing to do with it. That wasn't good enough for Reid who, even before major legislative fights have really kicked into hear, is sensing his party may not be up to the fight. With early announcements of retirements and rumors of perhaps a few more, Reid is worried that the stated unity he has claimed in press appearances will not hold.
Meanwhile, with Reid being nipped and nicked from a thousand different directions, House minority leader Nancy Pelosi is attempting to position herself to fill the void left if Reid in fact flames out. Against advise from party media consultants, Pelosi refused to trim back her post-State of the Union remarks made on national TV, which seemed to go on for 20 minutes and focused on one of her weaker areas of expertise: foreign policy.
"If Pelosi is anything, she's an opportunist," says a Republican House leadership aide. "We don't sell her short."
In fact, many Republicans believe it is Pelosi who has been spreading the rumors that her whip, Maryland Rep. Steny Hoyer, is mulling a run for the Senate should Sen. Paul Sarbanes decide to retire.
"She's been looking to get Hoyer out of the way, and she's the one who privately has been pushing the Senate rumors. It isn't coming from Hoyer and it isn't coming from the Senate campaign committee," says the Republican staffer.
Pelosi would like to elevate one of her lieutenants with whom she feels a stronger ideological kinship.
The democRATic party ,, all clinton, all the time.. RIP
One Clinton. Or the other.
Depends on which one's talking...
Is this the Dem Civil War that we've all been waiting for? Do we see Dean and Pelosi take half and we see Reid, the Clintons, and the DLC going the other direction? The centrist Dems, after they shed their Left, can probably absorb some moderate republicans. The "Deaniac Dems" would probably be able to absorb -- and mobilize, the Green party. We would have a fractious political system similar to that we saw before the Civil War. Thoughts???
Curiously, in many non-US Western countries, the new party of the centrist Dems and moderate Republicans combined would be equivalent to the "main" "centre-right" party, while the new party formed by Deaniacs Democrats together with the US Green Party would be equal to the "main" "centre-left" party. And then astonishingly, there will still be room for yet one more hard left party to the left of the Deaniacs!
The only thing further left than the Deaniacs are the Libertarians - especially on foreign policy. Although, quite often the Buchananites are that far left as well.
Full marks for that one. This is what the real hard left outside the US looks like on foreign policy.
Yeah but it would be the opposite in the US. You see, Western Europe is Center-Left, while the US is a Center-Right Country.
You may actually see the United States follow the path of our UK brethren: The Tories are Center-Right, Labour is Center-Left, and the Liberal Democratic Party occupying the Left-Left.
Reid will never "flame out". Fade out, fizzle out, flub out, yes, but he'll bore everyone into a coma before that happens. Maybe that's the destiny of the Democrat Party; in a last-gasp, final fade-out it's bored to death.
Blair's first words of advice would be "get rid of all your old fools and the far left." Which of course would include John Kerry.
Regards, Ivan
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.