The problem with your rebuttal is that Dr Spetzler to this day can not explain what happened in that OR that day and he was there. He would certainly know the sequnce of events.
Why exactly would that be a "problem" for the points I made in my post? Be specific.
Most surgeons don't have much of a familiarity with OBEs, nor is there much agreement on what exactly causes them, so I'm hardly surprised that Dr. Spetzler doesn't have "an explanation" for her subjective experience. But this in no way poses any "problem" for the points I made in my post, and I'm curious as to why you seem so firmly convinced that it does.
He would certainly know the sequnce of events.
Yes, I'm sure he would. Which is probably why nothing in the article indicates him saying anything which contradicts the points in my post, nor does the article quote him in any way confirming that the events she reported took place during the "brain flatline" period of the surgery, instead of during the surgical prep stage.
Now did you have anything that *actually* poses any "problem" for my points, or would you like to post some more vague but irrelevant innuendo?