Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop
It was sort of a pun. The "box" I was thinking of was the conceptual box of determinism that I was trying to go beyond with my actions. That "box" made me think of Skinner's stimulus-response formulation of psychology, which I always have thought was crap. (A "Skinner box"--what he called an "Heir Conditioner"--was of course a very different thing.) However, since coming to realize, through introspection, just how much of my conscious thought simply rolls down the groove of least resistance, I have decided that maybe Skinner's ideas weren't 100% unadulterated crap.
661 posted on 02/16/2005 6:43:11 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies ]


To: Physicist

I'd be curious to know which of Skinner's scientific ideas are absolute crap. Nevermind his politics or dreams of utopia. He did have a big fight with Noam Chomsky, a plus in my book.


675 posted on 02/16/2005 8:52:45 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 661 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson