Posted on 02/12/2005 1:43:03 AM PST by kipita
Kenya's government, which was elected on a pledge to fight corruption, has been hit by the resignation of its chief anti-corruption official John Githongo this week.
Donor countries have threatened to suspend aid if they cannot be sure that their money will be well spent.
Kenya's leaders are not the only ones to find that eradicating corrupt practices is a tall order.
Sceptics fear that the UK-led move to increase aid to Africa and forgive their debts will only make more money available to corrupt elites.
Western governments are increasingly linking aid to good governance, and in particular to efforts to tackle corruption.
So, is corruption in Africa getting worse, or just getting more attention?
Brave
William Kalema, Chairman of the Board of the Uganda Investment Authority, and one of the Commissioners for Africa named by UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, is not sure if corruption is worse than five or 10 years ago but says it is certainly more widespread than 20 or 30 years ago.
"The scale is increasing but I think also that the information about it is also increasing.
"The erosion of institutions in Africa has been a steady process so if the institutions get weaker every year then the time comes when they are so weakened that certain things are possible that would not have been possible before."
Jeremy Pope, a founding executive director of the anti-corruption watchdog Transparency International, says Kenya's anti-corruption chief John Githongo did his best but was blocked by powerful political groups.
"It's been a very gutsy performance by John, he has stuck in there to do absolutely what he could," he said.
"He realised that he was going to get nowhere because the political forces against reform were so much stronger and were outwitting the political forces in favour of reform."
Lone reformer
Nigeria's President Olusegun Obasanjo has also found it difficult to stamp out corruption once in office.
Mr Pope says he is desperately trying to get on top of corruption but that even the president can do little on his own.
"Everybody knows that come a certain date, he will be out of office, he will be gone, and the inertia is there. It is very, very difficult for a reformer at the top unless there are people like him throughout the system."
Zambia and Malawi have had a similar experiences, with new presidents promising to get tough on corruption facing political obstacles, sometimes from within their own parties
"What has been revealed is a hopelessly corrupt political elite - a political class across the spectrum that simply sees politics as a way of becoming wealthy," Mr Pope says.
"As long as politics is seen as the path to wealth, then Africa is on a downward path."
He points to Botswana as proof that African countries can be well governed.
"They look after their money, they invest wisely, and they run a decent country with a very good human rights record."
Gloomy
Mr Kalema says that both African countries and the west can take measures to make it harder for the corrupt to benefit from their crimes.
"In many consultative meetings people called on particularly the governments of the West to make it very much harder for ill-gotten gains to be salted away in their banks.
Other suggestions are to make it easier for African countries to recover stolen assets.
And to publish information that would enable civil society to hold leaders to account regarding the use of funds and regarding their own personal gains from public funds.
Mr Pope feels that the only solution is the emergence of a new political class that has not had to buy its way into politics.
But he emphasises that it is not just African countries themselves who are responsible for corruption.
"When one focuses on corruption in Africa, the tendency is to think only in terms of Africa. But the international banks, the Western businessmen who bribe to get the contract, who are in cahoots with all the millionaires are all up to their eyeballs in what's taking place.
"So when it comes to moral standing everybody belongs in the gutter together."
A gloomy picture.
But at least the new emphasis on linking aid to good governance gives both Western and African governments a greater incentive to see what they can each to do to tackle the scourge of corruption.
Don't know about Africa but it is alive and well in democrat strongholds in the USA
After all, OUR corruption is entirely legal!
From Western Banks, set up to shelter... what?
The entire continent has been ravaged with aids epidemic, and lawlessness. It is veruy sad.
You have got to be joking? I guess then the millions dying in Genocide is not Genocide, it is defered abortions by western standards!
Africa is and has always been morally corrupt (and predictably impoverished) based on Western standards. We can't seem to enforce higher standards, so what should we do? I say understand what exists and work within the framework of what exists as opposed to the dramatic shift to Western standards. I personally like reasonable plans and efficient actions.
"A fool is happy that he knows no more." A.Pope
If Nigerians are that happy, what with religious and tribal strife and economic stagnation and living a gunshot away from chaos, then I'm happy for them.
The problem is, the "barter" system does not allow for any kind of significant progress, any hope for a better life. Economic maturation depends on the rule of law, enforceable contracts, and private ownership of property.
Until then, all you have is various looters vying for a bigger share of the loot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.