Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SUING A 7-YEAR-OLD
http://www.clevescene.com/issues/2005-02-09/news/firstpunch.html ^ | February 11, 2005

Posted on 02/11/2005 11:21:34 AM PST by UpHereEh

As a general rule, suing a seven-year-old won't score you any points with St. Peter. But Mary Ellen Michaels and her lawyer, Judson Hawkins, already have guaranteed reservations at the Burning Lake of Fire Spa & Resort. Our saga began when Michaels was rollerblading down a Metroparks bike path in Strongsville last spring. She came upon a seven-year-old riding a bike. Behind the boy was his grandma, who was watching him while his parents were on a trip to New Orleans.

Michaels yelled at the boy to get out of the way. The kid stopped his bike, giving Michaels barely enough room to pass. She tried to squeeze through, but never made it. The toe of her rollerblade caught the bike's rear wheel. Michaels' leg snapped, and her foot twisted 180 degrees. "This was a serious injury," says Hawkins.

Most people would chalk it up to bad luck. What are you gonna do, sue a seven-year-old?

Well, if you're Mary Ellen Michaels, yes.

And just to secure her future in the Land of 1,000 Screams, she also sued Grandma and the boy's parents, who were a thousand miles away at the time.

The boy's lawyer politely notes that this was a bad move. "Basically, what we said is that even if you accept everything she says as fact, she still doesn't have a case," says Patrick Roche. Translation in non-lawyerspeak: "What the %$#@ is wrong with you, Mary Ellen?"

Both the trial and the appellate courts tossed the case. But that doesn't mean the kid's getting off scot-free. Michaels directed her lawyer to fight all the way to the Ohio Supreme Court. "I don't take frivolous cases," says Hawkins, whose hobbies presumably include stealing old people's medicine and torturing kittens. "I did considerable research before I sued a seven-year-old. Given the nature of the injury, I thought it merited a lawsuit."


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: lawsuit; suehappy; tortreform; tortreformnow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last
To: UpHereEh

A loser pays system would solve this problem real quick.


41 posted on 02/11/2005 11:40:26 AM PST by TXBSAFH (Never underestimate the power of human stupidity--Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wireplay
I don't see any case here....she PASSED him, apparently not well, but she was definately in control of the situation....

10 to 1, she's a bitchy liberal elitist who thinks only her kind of athletic body forms should have any rights to parks.....

there's a whole movement by some who think the National Parks should not cater to cars, or campers or people who can't backpack 20 miles in...which means most people...

42 posted on 02/11/2005 11:40:55 AM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67
"Speed limits are posted (and I doubt she was exceeding them) and your supposed to STAY in your lane (to the right)."

Maybe she did not exceed a BICYCLE safe speed - but clearly she exceeded a ROLLERBLADE safe speed; and CLEARLY demonstrated she had no control over her own mode of transportation. IMO, it was she who was negligent.

43 posted on 02/11/2005 11:41:11 AM PST by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67
You don't have the right to rear-end someone on the road -- even when you've the ROW, you have to do what you can to avoid an accident. I'd still say the kid would have a better day in court than this crazy woman and her weasel of a lawyer.

I picture a really enraged jury--I'd be furious to find myself on a panel to go after a kid who was hit from behind by someone clearly incapable of safe rollerblading.

I figure she'll eventually go after the municipality...

44 posted on 02/11/2005 11:41:51 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Point out the language suggestive of a head-on approach
She came upon a seven-year-old riding a bike. Behind the boy was his grandma, who was watching him while his parents were on a trip to New Orleans.

Think about it.

45 posted on 02/11/2005 11:42:06 AM PST by bikepacker67 ("Donovan McNabb... I can't HEAR YOU" < / Who's your Mommy>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: two134711

is = does, D'oh!


46 posted on 02/11/2005 11:42:15 AM PST by two134711
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67

You have 'guidelines' for bike paths. These are not laws or hard and fast rules. Similar to a ski slope or sidewalks. There is no obligation for a person to stay in their lane. If you find a law that says that it is mandatory, please let us know.


47 posted on 02/11/2005 11:42:16 AM PST by wireplay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: UpHereEh

If she ran into the kid, couldn't he sue her??


48 posted on 02/11/2005 11:42:34 AM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UpHereEh
"I did considerable research before I sued a seven-year-old. Given the nature of the injury, I thought it merited a lawsuit."

Just when you thought you'd heard it all....

49 posted on 02/11/2005 11:42:51 AM PST by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
Sounds like she failed to yield.

More like tried to shove the kid out of the way after screaming at him.

50 posted on 02/11/2005 11:43:10 AM PST by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
You don't have the right to rear-end someone on the road
She DIDN'T REAR END HIM. He was coming HEAD ON - IN HER LANE.

Read the Article.

51 posted on 02/11/2005 11:43:19 AM PST by bikepacker67 ("Donovan McNabb... I can't HEAR YOU" < / Who's your Mommy>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67

A blader staying in 'their' lane. That's a joke. They take up both lanes and only move to the side during a pass.


52 posted on 02/11/2005 11:44:29 AM PST by wireplay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
Countersue for assault and battery, and failure to show proper care with rollerblades. The little boy likely has a better cause of action!! She hit him from behind, after all, if what I understand from the article is true.

Absolutely! Nasty little pinheads like this need a whack upside the head with a reality stick. A countersuit is precisely what should be done.

53 posted on 02/11/2005 11:44:30 AM PST by TChris (Most people's capability for inference is severely overestimated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: UpHereEh
Irrespective of age, child was stopped, she was moving. It was her responsibility to negotiate safely. A non-moving object, in most instances, is considered the same as a tree or rock. It has the right to be where it is.

That being said, I hope her leg hurts real good. She deserves it for pulling this garbage.

54 posted on 02/11/2005 11:44:37 AM PST by Richard Kimball (It was a joke. You know, humor. Like the funny kind. Only different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67

The article specifically states that she was passing him, which to me indicates that they were going the same way. he stopped, and she was stupid enough to pass when there wasn't enough room. i see absolutely no reason that this poor boy should e penalized for a stupid woman's lack of Rollerblading skills.


55 posted on 02/11/2005 11:45:40 AM PST by Celtic Rose (It may be prudent in me to act sometimes by other men's reason, but I can think only by my own)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67
Look... those are the rules. You are a man (woman) who respects rules, yes?

The kid stopped his bike, giving Michaels barely enough room to pass. She tried to squeeze through, but never made it. The toe of her rollerblade caught the bike's rear wheel. Michaels' leg snapped, and her foot twisted 180 degrees. "This was a serious injury," says Hawkins.

It is not the NJ Turnpike. Common courtesy and common sense needs to be applied on a recreational bike path. She tried to make it but failed to do so. Just because someone is driving under the speed limit does not give you the right to basically ram them from behind. The kid stopped but she failed to be under control of her "vehicle" and stop as well.

56 posted on 02/11/2005 11:45:46 AM PST by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ScottFromSpokane

Whether on a bike on a bike path or in a car in a neighborhood I slow down when approaching kids. You never know what they might do.

It is called common sense. It is not the kids' fault.


57 posted on 02/11/2005 11:47:36 AM PST by kpp_kpp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: UpHereEh
Don't the lawyers have to prove that the boy had a duty not to be riding his bike there, and that the boy failed to do his duty?

Is there something more to this story, suggesting that the boy was riding his bike in a dangerous or negligent manner? That would seriously affect whether or not she has a case (against the boy and the grandmother... I don't see how she could sue the parents, but I'm not an attorney).

58 posted on 02/11/2005 11:48:00 AM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67
"The toe of her rollerblade caught the bike's rear wheel.<

Read the Article.
"

I don't know how you conclude she and he were approaching one another instead of her coming up on him from the rear.

59 posted on 02/11/2005 11:48:05 AM PST by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67
I'm not a fan of litigiousness, but shouldn't lil' Johnny be practicing his cycling skills in a driveway or sidewalk? Bike paths are not unlike roadways... you stay to the right, and the speed is usually 10-15mph. No place for a teetering 7 y.o.

I'm not sure you read the same article as I did.

-There's no indication whatsoever that the kid is anything but a fantastic bicyclist.

-Whether the boy was to the right or left on the path is not stated.

-Mary Ellen Michaels was rollerblading down a bike path and "came upon" the kid and "yelled" at him to get out of the way.

-The kid stopped his bike in response to her yelling.

-She had "barely enough room to pass"? Clearly this means, "on the side of him that she tried to pass", and that the other side had plenty of space, but she didn't pick that side....

All of this points to Lady Rollerblader as being out of control and unable to stop in time to avoid hazards.

I say this as someone who rollerblades too (and not necessarily all that well :). I can totally imagine this situation - in fact had one like it just yesterday. The problem with rollerblades is the difficulty of stopping. It's not a 7 year old kid's responsibility to be deft and spry and have the ability to snatch his bike off the roadway at a moment's notice due to the braying of some out of control rollerblading lady who can't stop and can't take responsibility for her lack of skillfulness (like I can :)

60 posted on 02/11/2005 11:48:09 AM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson