Skip to comments.
Burglar-alarm policy prompts call to arms - Resident urges purchase of guns, mayoral recall
San Francisco Chronicle ^
| 2/11/5
| Janine DeFao
Posted on 02/11/2005 7:52:00 AM PST by SmithL
With his city's police force poised to become the first in California to stop responding to most burglar alarms, Fremont insurance salesman Dennis Wolfe is urging his fellow citizens to arm themselves.
"I absolutely believe everybody should own a gun in Fremont now," Wolfe said Thursday. "If the police aren't going to protect us, we have to protect ourselves."
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; bang; banglist; bayarea; burglaralarm; fremont; protectandserve
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Lock-n-load
1
posted on
02/11/2005 7:52:00 AM PST
by
SmithL
To: Citizen James
2
posted on
02/11/2005 7:52:48 AM PST
by
SmithL
(Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?)
To: SmithL
It is about time that the fight started in San Freakcisco. A revolution is in order to take that city back from the utopian communists running it, and bring it back into REAL AMERICA. A put the activist, criminal officials in the Bay with the fishes.
3
posted on
02/11/2005 7:54:31 AM PST
by
EagleUSA
To: EagleUSA
Not San Francisco. Fremont.
To: SmithL
Isn't San Francisco trying to ban all handguns as well? If so, let me get this straight - they are going to stop responding to burglar alarms AND keep residents from arming themselves? If I were a thief, I'd move to San Francisco right away.
To: EagleUSA
It is about time that the fight started in San Freakcisco Sorry, this is not San Francisco. Fremont is on the other side of the Bay, closer to San Jose than Oakland.
6
posted on
02/11/2005 7:58:22 AM PST
by
SmithL
(Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?)
To: EagleUSA
The article is about Fremont, Calif. and is printed in a SF newspaper.
7
posted on
02/11/2005 7:58:31 AM PST
by
Michael.SF.
(Someday I will fondly look back on the day Hillary's career ended. Starting tomorrow, I hope.)
To: SmithL
The Mayor does not want to alienate the criminal community as it is most of his constituency.
To: TexasAg1996
OK on Fremont! :-) and yes, San Freakcisco is trying to squash the Second Amendment for city residents like Washington, DC did. The radical extremists running what used to be a respectable city, are trying to turn it into a totalitarian environment, above the law, with an "anything goes" mentality. One of the most extreme examples of the runaway madness of the radical left.
9
posted on
02/11/2005 8:00:08 AM PST
by
EagleUSA
To: SmithL
99.999 percent of these alarms are false. I don't blame the city at all.
10
posted on
02/11/2005 8:01:08 AM PST
by
UB355
To: EggsAckley
heck! It's Kalifornia - they are ALL Kommies on the Koast!
11
posted on
02/11/2005 8:06:27 AM PST
by
CLS
To: UB355
But, but...if even one is a true call, isn't it worth it?
12
posted on
02/11/2005 8:12:29 AM PST
by
Safetgiver
(Mud slung is ground lost.)
To: CLS
just in case .... the komment was sarKasm!
13
posted on
02/11/2005 8:16:30 AM PST
by
CLS
To: SmithL
--and when they buy one, go to city hall and apply for and demand a concealed weapons permit--if a few thousand of you Commiefornianas in LA and San Francisco would do that your politicians would be jumping through hoops to accomodate you---
14
posted on
02/11/2005 8:16:47 AM PST
by
rellimpank
(urban dwellers don' t understand the cultural deprivation of not being raised on a farm)
To: UB355
99.999 percent of these alarms are false. I don't blame the city at all. Riiiight. Don't wanna tear those cops away from their flops and donut havens!
15
posted on
02/11/2005 8:18:27 AM PST
by
balrog666
(A myth by any other name is still inane.)
To: SmithL
he plans to seek a concealed weapons permit for his new handgun. Wasserman said Wolfe will have a tough time getting one from the police chief. Um, why? Just because he annoys you? Is that legal?
16
posted on
02/11/2005 8:21:50 AM PST
by
Incandesia
(Please don't eat the Newbie)
To: UB355
Where did you get that percentage?
17
posted on
02/11/2005 8:28:27 AM PST
by
em2vn
To: UB355
"99.999 percent of these alarms are false. I don't blame the city at all."
Unless someone near and dear was the lottery ticket holder for 00.001 maybe???
18
posted on
02/11/2005 8:31:06 AM PST
by
Ursus arctos horribilis
("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
To: Ursus arctos horribilis
B-B-But...it's for the Children!...
To: SmithL
Having dealt with flaky several burglar alarm systems in my houses over the years, I'm all too familiar with the problem of false alarms. But there are compromise positions between rushing to every alarm without any kind of check and refusing to respond at all.
Actually, one time the burglar alarm went off in our house about 20 years ago. I got up, shut if off, went downstairs to investigate, and found that the burglar must have set off the alarm in the dining room. He jumped out of a window and left a set of prints in the flowerbed outside. So the alarm did serve a useful purpose.
20
posted on
02/11/2005 9:15:34 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson