"Gould's idea of rerunning the tape of life is not hypothetical; it's happening all around us. And the result is well known to biologists — evolutionary convergence."
THINK for yourself! If you were to come upon an object on Mars in the shape of a polished table or even a perfect triangle, you would immediately recognize the probability of intentional design. Why, then, do you fail to see the designer's hand in the breathtaking complexity of the simplest one-celled organism?
I have found that ardent evolutionists invariably point to what someone else says, rather than using their own power of reason.
Hi! Actually, I was just posting those quotes to show, in the evolutionists own words, the inconsistencies of evolution theory. The slow, methodical march of RM/NS seems to be insufficient to account for the complex morphological transformations we see in nature.
I agree with what you said, btw. :)
"I have found that ardent evolutionists invariably point to what someone else says, rather than using their own power of reason."
Point to what somebody else says, like say, 1 chapter of a 1-bazillion year old book written secondhand by a few dozen different people?
Did you THINK up those arguments for yourself?
Because I can see the obvious difference between life and an artifact. No one is questioning G-d or Creation. Science is simply looking into the mechanism by which, over millions, perhaps billions of years life evolved. And it did. Why would anyone find such study so threatening?