[narby]

It appears she was his sister. (It's not uncommon to find this in the Bible.)

And where is this written?

My point is that the Bible didn't say. Like it didn't say HOW God formed species. Your entire rant against Evolution is merely because you can't find it in your Bible. As you can't find theories of Gravity, or Nuclear forces, etc. etc.

How come you people pick this particular thing to dispute, but not all the other things left out of the Bible?

The creationists have already damaged religion over the past 75 years, far more than I'm sure you will ever accept. It's too long of a thing to explain. And you wouldn't believe me anyway, so why should I bother?

[Oztrich Boy]

Your entire rant against Evolution is merely because you can't find it in your Bible. As you can't find theories of Gravity, or Nuclear forces, etc. etc.

Or, if it come to that, any mention of the playtpus.

[Elsie]

And where is this written?

My point is that the Bible didn't say. Like it didn't say HOW God formed species. Your entire rant against Evolution is merely because you can't find it in your Bible. As you can't find theories of Gravity, or Nuclear forces, etc. etc.

How come you people pick this particular thing to dispute, but not all the other things left out of the Bible?

The creationists have already damaged religion over the past 75 years, far more than I'm sure you will ever accept. It's too long of a thing to explain. And you wouldn't believe me anyway, so why should I bother?

 

And where is this written? (in the 'fossil record')

My point is that the ROCKS don't say. Like it didn't say HOW TIME & CHANCE formed species. Your entire rant against CREATION is merely because you can't find it in your ROCKS you can't find theories of Gravity, or Nuclear forces, etc. etc.

How come you people pick this particular thing to dispute, but not all the other things left out of the ROCK LAYERS?

The EVOLUTIONISTS have already damaged religion over the past 75 years, far more than I'm sure you will ever accept. It's too long of a thing to explain. And you wouldn't believe me anyway, so why should I bother?

---

---

 

You see; by merely changing the words, you and I are saying the same thing.

[Elsie]

And where is this written?

It's called 'reading between the lines'.

Just the same thing an E type does to 'connect' the various fossils found in rocks.

---

(It appears that both sides in this debate are standing on the rock....

"If it isn't CHISLED in stone...."

and

"If it's not FOUND in stone....."

;^)