To: advance_copy
Uh, oh. If MD4 first put this up at 11:05, yet the WaPo story occurred no later than 11:34 on 2/8, there is no way that WaPo could have gotten their information from the public MD4 post. How could they have written the story, edited it, and published on their web site in 29 minutes? They didn't! WaPo had the NCPAC e-mails prior to public posting by MD4. The public posting was just a cover. So, either MD4 is a WaPo insider, or someone there hacked NCPAC's private e-mail.
Any lawyers out there who can comment on this??
504 posted on
02/11/2005 7:36:28 AM PST by
Antoninus
(In hoc sign, vinces †)
To: Antoninus
Great question...
ping to read later....
506 posted on
02/11/2005 7:37:38 AM PST by
Freedom2specul8
(Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
To: Antoninus
Any lawyers out there who can comment on this?? When I got the board in the wee hours this morning, It was my understanding that we are working on it.
That is why Jim put the thread in question back up.
He said it was developing!
They are all over it.
520 posted on
02/11/2005 7:55:12 AM PST by
Cold Heat
(What are fears but voices awry?Whispering harm where harm is not and deluding the unwary. Wordsworth)
To: Antoninus
"or someone there hacked NCPAC's private e-mail."
Coincidence??? I think not. Out of all the thousands of FReepmails someone decided to hack into NCPAC's FReepmail???
Naahhhh.
Me thinks your first scenario more likely.
539 posted on
02/11/2005 8:06:58 AM PST by
clyde260
(Public Enemy #1: Network News!)
To: Antoninus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson