Replies

"Well then, the question is whether creationism belongs in a science class, given that it's not science."

It doesn't ... unless you have your doubts about the motives and truthfulness, and honesty, about people who claim to know what 'science' means, people who claim to conduct scientific research 'objectively', people who claim to understand what 'reasoning' is .... in short, if scientists are trustworthy, then they have rights to kick out religionists.

But, after hard, unpleasant experience, I have found that scientists are not trustworthy, certainly not more trustworthy than Christians. I have found they have agendas that they push, and that they use evolution as a moral backdrop for some aspects of that agenda.

I have found that 'scientists' hate to compete w/ Christians. Now, the leftist scientists ... they make sense to me. They have bottomless hunger for fame and attention, because most of them have no memory of being spanked.

The atheistic right wingers here? They want to save the GOP from the Christians - that is why they fight for the 'rationality of the ToE?

They are mystery men (and women?); especially given that they basically stand watch at Freeper terminals year after year, and write the same stuff, year after year. Somehow, they believe they are doing mankind a service, all the while ignoring the real enemy: communisitic atheistic sexually depraved materialists who want to corrupt our kids.

Somehow, we Christians are more of a threat. It is a mystery all right. (Unless they are especially clever, long-lived trolls ....)

And they never post links that argue in a scientific manner why what they are selling here at FR makes good political sense for the GOP as a whole. The rant, but they fail to rationalize effectively their motives...

The 71 percent of the voters in this article ... they seem to 'understand' the big picture just fine. And, surprise, W is president. How ridicously unscientific of them...

(gotta check on something ....)