Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House OKs Tougher Driver ID Rules
Fox News ^ | 02/10/2005 | AP

Posted on 02/10/2005 2:39:53 PM PST by devane617

WASHINGTON — Hoping to keep drivers licenses out of the hands of terrorists (search), the House voted Thursday to make states verify that applicants are U.S. citizens or legal immigrants. Republicans pushed the measure through on a 261-161 vote despite protests from governors and state motor vehicle departments that it would be too costly and would require them to take on the role of immigration officers. The bill also would make it easier for judges to deport immigrants seeking political asylum if they think they might be terrorists. "Common sense says we should not allow suspected terrorists to be able to stay inside our borders if they could harm us," said House Speaker Dennis Hastert. The measure was rejected by Congress and the White House in December as part of a bill reorganizing intelligence agencies in response to flaws found after the Sept. 11, 2001, (search) terrorism attacks. It was revived with newly won support from the Bush administration.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arizona; US: California; US: New Mexico; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 109th; aliens; border; driverlicense; driverslicense; hr418; illegal; immigration; motorvoter; nationalid; september12era
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last
Loks like this bill will be defeated by the Senate. When will congress do the work of the people and start protecting our borders.
1 posted on 02/10/2005 2:39:53 PM PST by devane617
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: devane617

After the next 9/11.


2 posted on 02/10/2005 2:45:15 PM PST by iceskater (Madness takes it toll. Please have exact change ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devane617
"Common sense says we should not allow suspected terrorists to be able to stay inside our borders if they could harm us,"

You're talking the Senate here, yaknow, The institution that would not do its duty during the Clinton impeachment ...

Why would we expect them to care about this nation when they could care less about the Constitution they are sworn to uphold and defend?

Par for the course.

3 posted on 02/10/2005 2:54:20 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devane617

Time to start banging on the doors of Congress and the WHite Hoyse. Going to DC to maked sure they get they FULL meaning mat be our only choice!!


4 posted on 02/10/2005 2:57:59 PM PST by 26lemoncharlie (Sit nomen Dómini benedíctum,Ex hoc nunc, et usque in sæculum! per ómnia saecula saeculórum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devane617
If anyone in the Senate protests too much the bill's sponsors can just point to the Holy Grail, the 911 Commission Report. Remember, in Washington this is the sole beacon of truth because it was a commission dammit!

This was so important last year that Congress and the President were supposed to come in from the campaign trail and pass it. Everyone knows the terrorists would wait 39 months after 9/11/01 but it's that 40th month that's critical. We had to act now!

5 posted on 02/10/2005 3:00:09 PM PST by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devane617

It'll be good to get senators to vote on this. We'll know who stands where.


6 posted on 02/10/2005 3:00:52 PM PST by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan
It'll be good to get senators to vote on this. We'll know who stands where.

Every RAT that is up for re-election in 2006 will vote for it. Bank on it.

7 posted on 02/10/2005 3:14:17 PM PST by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Go Gordon

Everyone in a red state certainly will anyways.


8 posted on 02/10/2005 3:24:39 PM PST by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: devane617

I could rant for hours; but I think that we are all on the same level. Ergo, I will forego my rant.


9 posted on 02/10/2005 3:27:03 PM PST by Cobra64 (Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devane617
When will congress do the work of the people and start protecting our borders.

Next election, Hilliary will be elected President on this issue.

10 posted on 02/10/2005 3:34:53 PM PST by Protagoras (Un-apprehended criminals have no credibility when advocating for the WOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan; All

A great victory for liberty...and a brutal defeat for the "ENEMY WITHIN" our borders....until the Senate gets ahold and rips out the heart...but for now...we can stand and take note.


11 posted on 02/10/2005 3:46:56 PM PST by underwiredsupport (for the shape of things to come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: iceskater

The ID provisions are a giant encroachment on State perogatives. The law essentially creates a de facto national ID card. I don't like the looks of this one bit.


12 posted on 02/10/2005 3:49:13 PM PST by New Orleans Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"Why would we expect them to care about this nation when they could care less about the Constitution they are sworn to uphold and defend?

I just read Article I, Section 8 (Powers of Congress) all 18 clauses, there is absolutely no reference at all to a delegated power that would constitutionally allow the "...House...make states verify that applicants are U.S. citizens or legal immigrants."

Subsequently, Amendment X is the controlling constitutional covenant concerning this issue.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

It is obvious that the House members, conservatives no doubt, do in fact care very little for the Constitution they are sworn to uphold by deliberately passing unconstitutional legislation.

13 posted on 02/10/2005 3:51:38 PM PST by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: devane617

Who is Congressman Paul (R TX)?


14 posted on 02/10/2005 3:53:22 PM PST by CDB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iceskater

Do you think? I'm not so sure. One 9/11 should have done the trick, but here we are...


15 posted on 02/10/2005 3:58:45 PM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: underwiredsupport

I know this isn't going anywhere in the senate but I'm just glad something is happening on this issue.


16 posted on 02/10/2005 4:09:17 PM PST by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras; jveritas; bayourod; Howlin
Next election, Hilliary will be elected President on this issue.

That will just make your day, won't it?

17 posted on 02/10/2005 4:12:17 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CDB

"Who is Congressman Paul (R TX)?"

One of the better politicians in the nation. Basically a libertarian running under a Republican banner. The only reason I'd ever move to Texas again is to vote for that guy.


18 posted on 02/10/2005 4:13:33 PM PST by New Orleans Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
That will just make your day, won't it?

How so?

19 posted on 02/10/2005 4:13:58 PM PST by Protagoras (Un-apprehended criminals have no credibility when advocating for the WOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Hillary Clinton, the potential Hitler of our time, is now in position to take over the country.


20 posted on 02/10/2005 4:15:50 PM PST by Protagoras (Un-apprehended criminals have no credibility when advocating for the WOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson