Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Tomorrow's New York Times article on the NCPAC/O'Malley rumors.

They're LURKING....

1 posted on 02/09/2005 8:13:47 PM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: conservative in nyc
Using his screen name, NCPAC, after the National Conservative Political Action Committee, where he once worked, Mr. Steffen thanked correspondents to the Web site for their support, writing, "This might even burnish my reputation."

I read this quote from him earlier today...accept as I read it, it was part of a longer comment on his regret at the amount of trouble this has caused. In no way an attempt to bolster himself or "raise his stake" in any of this.

Context please NYT.

2 posted on 02/09/2005 8:21:23 PM PST by wallcrawlr (www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc

Add this link to the ones in the Washington Post and the Baltimore Sun and then wonder why we are suddenly up to our armpits in trolls...


3 posted on 02/09/2005 8:22:00 PM PST by RebelBanker (To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of the women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc

**waves to NYTIMES interns**

Someone tell Bill Keller his ramblings in the recent New Yorker article were hysterical.


4 posted on 02/09/2005 8:22:48 PM PST by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc

They may be lurking, but they forgot to report that the Washington Post story is a BLATANT LIE.

Steffen did NOT "spread rumors on a conservative Web site that the mayor once had an affair with a television news reporter." In an earlier post of the Washington Post story, which the Times drew on for this article, it can be clearly seen that Steffen did NOT post the initial rumor and, in his replies to it, said NOTHING to confirm, spread, or in any way further the rumor.

If the Times reporters only skimmed this recent post, they may have missed this fact. But the recent post links to the earlier post, where the plain fact can easily be seen, since that earlier thread was very short.

In other words, the Times has now joined the Post in spreading a DELIBERATE LIE. These people are absolute scum, not worthy to be called newspaper reporters even by the crudest standards. All the materials are there on FreeRepublic, in these two earlier threads. It would take no more than 10 or 15 minutes of research to disprove the main contention of the Washington Post.


5 posted on 02/09/2005 8:25:21 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc

P.S. Someone needs to alert Drudge to the way the Post and the Times have lied about what was said on an internet news source, just as they lied about what Drudge initially said about Monica.

Someone also should alert Rush Limbaugh, Powerline, Little Green Footballs, and some of the other blogs. The MSM have been caught with their pants down AGAIN, but that needs to be made evident. They certainly won't admit it unless they are pushed.

It's a work day tomorrow and I have to get to bed. But this lying propaganda campaign needs to be cut off at the knees before they try to spread it any further.


7 posted on 02/09/2005 8:29:32 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc

PPS: Here's the thread on the Washington Post article:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1339150/posts

And here's the original thread. Check it out. You can clearly see that NCPAC didn't post the original inquiry about the rumor, and that his comments do nothing to further the rumor. This is the critical evidence that the Post and Times stories are false.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1190972/posts


8 posted on 02/09/2005 8:34:41 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc
***ATTENTION NEW YORK TIMES***

Could you please provide how you concluded "rumors (were)spread by a Republican state official that the Democratic mayor once had an extramarital affair"?

Where on this site do you see that NCPAC "spread rumors" that Mayor O'Malley was having an affair?

Call me stupid but I have access to this site just like you and I cannot find anything posted by NCPAC that backs up your claim.

Thank you
9 posted on 02/09/2005 8:35:27 PM PST by blogblogginaway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc
The state Democratic Party nonetheless demanded an investigation smear campaign into whether Mr. Ehrlich had helped orchestrate a "smear campaign" against Mr. O'Malley, who is considered a potential opponent of Mr. Ehrlich in 2006.
10 posted on 02/09/2005 8:42:06 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc

Found This on the web:

WHAT IF : POLITICS : WHAT :
MAYOR O'MALLEY AND SADE BADERINWA HAD AN AFFAIR
important ballot by smiling_is_better
ACTIVE Jul 26, 2004 - Jul 26, 2005



Mayor O'Malley and News Ancor Sade Baderinwa had an affair, all of a sudden Judge O'Malley (Mayor's wife) orders Ms. Baderinwa to leave the state and take care of her problem (she supposed to be pregnant) This morning I heard on the news that Sade Baderinwa was covering a story, and was hit by a Hit and run automobile going extremly fast. Now what the hell is the odds of that? Oh by the way Mayor O'Malley is white, and Ms. Baderinwa is bi-racial(lets face reality she's Black) Oh and one more thing they did not catch the driver? What do you thing will be the outcome of this?


She will be murdered __
The pregnancy will be exposed __
She will evenually lose her job __
Mayor O'Malley will have a black child __
The fecal matter will hit the rotating blades __
No truth to it __


http://www.bestandworst.com/vote.php?id=44175&PHPSESSID=1f606c8e00936c1edce70ccf22a1d880


12 posted on 02/09/2005 9:27:03 PM PST by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
NY Times said: in postings Tuesday night on FreeRepublic.com, the Web site where he had spread rumors about Mr. O'Malley [emphasis added]

They lie. Did the NY Times rehire Jayson Blair?

The original post on FR, not by NCPAC, simply was asking people to figure out what the truth was. Many, if not, most replies debunked, cast doubt upon, or did not lend credence to the rumors.

The media now has NCPAC feeding the rumor, but the facts of the Post story do NOT support that conclusion. Instead, NCPAC commented on the rumor and said that a lot of effort was made to float the story.

That effort to float the story could easily have been from Dem opponents of O'Malley or corporate lobbyists with non-ideological non-party reasons for opposing O'Malley.

NCPAC even praised a prior post that shredded the credibility of the rumor.

You can read the original thread itself by clicking here, but below are two posts that made it crystal-clear that NCPAC was NOT feeding the rumors. Otherwise, why would he praise velmacruther's highly skeptical post?


To: Elkiejg

This rumor has been around for over three years ... and the identities of the anchorwoman (and the affiliate) AND the alleged father change every few months. At least seven anchorwomen in Baltimore have supposedly had the mayor's kids, or a police commissioner's kid, or a local professional athlete's kids ... too bad "The X Files" was cancelled ... Spooky Mulder was probably the only one who'd pay any attention ...

10 posted on 08/13/2004 10:17:17 AM PDT by VelmaCruther

To: VelmaCruther

Welcome to FR, VC.

Nice first post.

12 posted on 08/13/2004 10:39:16 AM PDT by NCPAC ((Live without Fear: Don't worry about what may happen. Concentrate on what must be done.))

13 posted on 02/09/2005 9:29:58 PM PST by BillF (Fight terrorists in Iraq & elsewhere, instead of waiting for them to come to America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc
They're LURKING....

They're also lying. He didn't start the rumour, someone else posted it here.

14 posted on 02/09/2005 9:38:23 PM PST by DJ MacWoW ("Are you cops? FBI" bad guy, "I'm currently unemployed" Tony Almeida of 24)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCPAC

Courtesy ping.


23 posted on 02/09/2005 9:48:58 PM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (Humina, humina, humina...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc; NCPAC

The whole d*** thing is ridiculous. I have yet to see any wrongdoing.


25 posted on 02/09/2005 10:39:54 PM PST by Angry Republican (" I want to bring back the radical side of Republicanism." - Michael Steele)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc

check out great 2/2002 photo of O'Malley and Sade on website mdsocietyforblind.org. Click on the children's event on home page.


33 posted on 02/10/2005 9:45:41 AM PST by wstoptheimmigration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc
Sidney Blumenthal (Hillary's butt kisser) seems to be working overtime!
43 posted on 02/11/2005 4:26:57 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc
"I just looked at him and my heart broke, that this poor 7-year-old kid has to worry about these lies," Ms. O'Malley said.

Wrong target, honey.

45 posted on 02/11/2005 5:11:44 AM PST by GVnana (If I had a Buckhead moment would I know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson