Grossly inaccurate cartoonish "summary" of the Big Bang scenario. Strike one.
You believe spontaneous generation.
Grossly inaccurate mischaracterization of abiogenesis. And since the evidence indicates that despite your personal incredulity (and without "magic wands"), that is indeed what actually happened, strike two.
You believe that infinites must be subsets of finites.
Now you're just babbling. Strike three.
And you're out.
Those magic wands are hard to hide.
What's actually "hard to hide" here is that you're trying to engage in a battle of wits while disarmed. Go learn something about science before you attempt to critique it, you're just making a fool of yourself.
Grossly inaccurate mischaracterization of abiogenesis. And since the evidence indicates that despite your personal incredulity (and without "magic wands"), that is indeed what actually happened, strike two.
So you admit you believe in spontaneous generation, Mr. Science? {insert guffaws and eye-rolling here) Anyone who cherishes known "old wives' tales" as you do shouldn't pretend to be a representative of science.
Your post is a keeper. It may come in handy in the future.