Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TransCanada proposes $1.7B US pipeline to ship oilsands crude to Illinois
CJAD ^ | February 9, 2005 | The Canadian Press

Posted on 02/09/2005 4:31:20 PM PST by Willie Green

For education and discussion only. Not for commercial use.

CALGARY (CP) - In a shift in business strategy, natural gas shipper TransCanada Corp. plans to build a $1.7-billion-US oil pipeline to transport about 400,000 barrels of heavy crude a day from Alberta to Illinois.

The 3,000-kilometre Keystone Pipeline, announced by the Calgary company Wednesday, includes a proposal to convert one of TransCanada's existing natural gas pipelines from Alberta to Manitoba to carry oil instead. At a point southwest of Winnipeg, a new connector line would be built, taking the oilsands crude through the American Midwest and into hubs at Wood River and Patoka, Ill.

"TransCanada is in the business of connecting energy supplies to markets and we view this opportunity as another way of providing a valuable service to our customers," chief executive Hal Kvisle said in a release.

"Converting one of our natural gas pipeline assets for oil transportation is an innovative, cost-competitive way to meet the need for pipeline expansions to accommodate anticipated growth in Canadian crude oil production during the next decade."

The Keystone plan puts Calgary-based TransCanada in direct competition with hometown rival Enbridge Inc. (TSX:ENB) to find new ways to ship rising amounts of oil from northern Alberta's oilsands to new markets throughout the U.S. and beyond.

Enbridge president Pat Daniel said Wednesday that competition in both gas and oil pipelines is both inevitable and positive for the energy industry.

"The very best business environment is a competitive one - it makes us all better," Daniel said in an interview with The Canadian Press. "It's better for our customers if we have to compete and we do a better job in delivering the product."

TransCanada (TSX:TRP), the country's main natural gas shipper and a growing electricity producer, said Wednesday that getting involved in oil pipelines was a natural progression for the company.

"We are a pipeline company, we've been doing it for over 50 years and we see oil as a logical fit with our existing business competencies," said spokeswoman Hejdi Feick.

Greg Stringham, vice-president of markets for the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers said TransCanada's first attempted forray into the oil pipeline business came as a surprise to many.

"It shows that the market is working because there are several alternatives now coming out, all looking at the potential opportunity of moving oil from the oilsands."

While Canada's oilsands is producing slightly more than one million barrels per day, that number is expected to double in six to eight years.

Feick said TransCanada believes converting a natural gas pipeline to carry oil is "not a complicated process," essentially replacing the compressor stations used for shipping gas with pumping stations needed to keep the molasses-like heavy oil moving down the line.

TransCanada said it plans to meet with oil producers and refiners to gauge interest and support for Keystone.

If the support is there, the company wants to fast-track the project, getting commitments for the line later this year and filing regulatory applications by the fall.

"We would see the system in service and operating by 2008-2009, providing we get the necessary regulatory approvals," said Feick.

TransCanada says it has already started preliminary discussions with various stakeholders, including communities, government representatives and landowners along the proposed route.

Pipeline analyst Bob Hastings of Canaccord Capital in Vancouver said it was "far from certain" whether the Keystone pipeline would ever be built, but it would now be up to the oilsands producers and refiners to select the best option for getting crude into the Midwest and beyond.

"These things get pretty competitive and you need to get producers' support," said Hastings. "It's still a long ways away, so there's lots of time for all the twists and turns to happen, but it probably has a shot."

TransCanada has a network of about 41,000 kilometres of pipeline transporting most of Western Canada's natural gas production to markets in Canada and the United States.

TransCanada has also been rapidly expanding its electricity business in recent years, owning, controlling or constructing more than 4,700 megawatts of power generation.

On the Toronto stock market Wednesday, TransCanada stock rose six cents to $30.06 in trading of nearly 1.7 million shares, while Enbridge shares rose 75 cents to $64.50.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: energy; nafta; oil; petroleum; pipeline

1 posted on 02/09/2005 4:31:20 PM PST by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

No Molson for oil!!!


2 posted on 02/09/2005 4:35:29 PM PST by satchmodog9 (Murder and weather are our only news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Would this reduce the natural gas supply, giving the remaining supply a premium?


3 posted on 02/09/2005 4:38:54 PM PST by Mark was here (My tag line was about to be censored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
I spent about 10 months working up in Alberta. I believe the estimates were their oil sands had enough to supply us for several hundred years. I say go Canada, scr*w Saudi Arabia.
4 posted on 02/09/2005 4:39:47 PM PST by Cornpone (Aging Warrior -- Aim High -- Who Dares Wins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Mark

They are probably getting their butts handed to them in the NG market due to new NG supplies in Southwest states such as Oklahoma and Texas.


5 posted on 02/09/2005 4:42:05 PM PST by phoenix0468 (One man with courage is a majority. (Thomas Jefferson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

Don't forget Saskachewan, they have oil too. One problem: NDP


6 posted on 02/09/2005 4:43:47 PM PST by -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Nothing new. Canada is our #1 supplier of foreign oil and natural gas.


7 posted on 02/09/2005 4:45:20 PM PST by Fledermaus (I Googled "Democrat+Sane" and got no hits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

I thought the chicoms had a lock on canadian oilsands.


8 posted on 02/09/2005 4:45:38 PM PST by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone
It ain't quite that easy. Alberta's got plenty of oil, but the cost of extracting it is very high compared to Saudi oil. Also, the quality isn't all that great, either -- oil from the tar sands has to be refined extensively before it can be used.

What you're probably seeing here is a market-based allocation of oil supplies by source and quality. Crummy oil from Alberta will be used primarily for lubricants and potentially for diesel fuel or home heating oil, while Saudi oil will be used for gasoline due to its very high quality.

9 posted on 02/09/2005 4:46:26 PM PST by Alberta's Child (I'm not expecting to grow flowers in the desert.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

400,000 barrels per day - ZOUNDS!


10 posted on 02/09/2005 4:46:47 PM PST by Enterprise ("Dance with the Devil by the Pale Moonlight" - Islam compels you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench

They do but the US is taking oilsands for granted.


11 posted on 02/09/2005 4:47:52 PM PST by -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

That is a cheap pipeline. The Alaska Pipeline was $7 billion and the Natural Gas Pipeline will be $20 billion at least.


12 posted on 02/09/2005 4:48:36 PM PST by RightWhale (Please correct if cosmic balance requires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I understand what you're saying. If I remember correctly its a water intensive steam extraction process and water is a real problem above the Yellowknife. Regardless, if the price of oil stays at or above $50 a barrel it will be economical. Contrary to most, I want to see the price stay high. That way there is the economic incentive to wean ourselves off Saudi oil.


13 posted on 02/09/2005 4:52:27 PM PST by Cornpone (Aging Warrior -- Aim High -- Who Dares Wins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: phoenix0468

"One man with courage makes a majority" -- Andrew Jackson


14 posted on 02/09/2005 4:53:37 PM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-

"Don't forget Saskachewan, they have oil too. One problem: NDP"

NDP energy policies are oil patch friendly and they are big promoters of the sector.

They were also the first to promote Oil Sands drilling technology with an International Conference on Horizontal Drilling that is now in its seventh year and attracts engineers from all over the world.


15 posted on 02/09/2005 5:55:46 PM PST by beaver fever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dr_who_2

Thank you, I got that quote off of a Thomas Jefferson quote page. I must rememdy that immediately.


16 posted on 02/09/2005 6:44:23 PM PST by phoenix0468 (One man with courage is a majority. (Andrew Jackson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson