Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

P.Kennedy Says Resistance to Gun Ban is 'INSANITY'
Cybercast News Service ^ | February 9, 2005 | Jeff Johnson

Posted on 02/09/2005 9:01:01 AM PST by kimber

U.S. Rep. Patrick Kennedy implied Tuesday that congressional colleagues who do not share his support for a failed gun ban being reintroduced in the House are mentally ill. The Rhode Island Democrat also accused lawmakers who oppose the anti-gun legislation of not caring about police safety.

Kennedy is the son of U.S. Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.) and the nephew of the late President John F. Kennedy and U.S. Sen. Robert Kennedy, both of whom were shot to death.

The younger Kennedy made the comments at a Capitol Hill press conference to promote the reintroduction of the "50 Caliber Sniper Rifle Reduction Act." The bill, introduced by U.S. Rep. Jim Moran (D-Va.), would ban the manufacture of such rifles and severely limit the sale or transfer of existing .50 BMG rifles except for those owned by the military or civilian law enforcement agencies.

"Any policy maker who, on the one hand, says that they are for combating terrorism but, on the other hand, will not back this legislation, backed by Representative Moran, to me has a lot of explaining to do," Kennedy said "In fact, I think it would be the definition of insanity to say that."

In addition to challenging his opponents' mental stability, Kennedy also questioned whether his fellow lawmakers could claim to support police while opposing the gun ban.

"If we don't pass this legislation, this Congress, implicitly, is saying that they do not care about the welfare of our law enforcement community," Kennedy said.

John Burtt - chairman of the Fifty Caliber Institute, the education and advocacy arm of the Fifty Caliber Shooters Association - told Cybercast News Service that Moran, Kennedy and their colleagues are trying to create "backdoor legislation to ban all firearms in this country.

"What they're doing is using hyperbole to create anxiety on the part of the uninformed public that these guns are dangerous, that they are a threat to national security," Burtt said, "but they are not."

Burtt said there has not been a single instance of terrorists using the .50 BMG in an attack on U.S. soil. A handout provided to the media at Moran's press conference listed 12 instances in which a .50 caliber rifle was used, threatened or intended for use in a criminal act. But Alan Gottlieb, founder of the Second Amendment Foundation, reviewed the list and questioned the nature of the examples.

"It's usually people who were prohibited from owning any kind of firearm to begin with and, as a result, should have been prohibited from owning a .50 caliber already," Gottlieb said. "There's no need to have a new law. They ought to just enforce the existing laws."

Moran believes, however, that there is no legitimate reason for civilians to own the rifles.

"It serves no purpose for hunting, whatsoever," Moran claimed. "If you went hunting with this, you would not have any trophy. All you'd have left would be some pieces of fur and hoof."

Burtt refuted Moran's assertion.

"I know a lot of people who hunt with the .50 BMG," Burtt said, noting that many people pursue elk, bear and other large game animals with the rifles. "When a .50 caliber round hits a large animal like that, it has tremendous knock-down power. But, it does nothing more than put a half-inch hole into the animal and knock it down.

"This is just somebody who, obviously, has no knowledge, whatsoever, about the hunting capabilities of these firearms making statements that are completely inaccurate," Burtt added.

U.S. Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.), whose husband was murdered and son wounded by a gunman on a Long Island commuter train in 1993, contributed to Moran's "no legitimate use" argument.

"This has nothing to do with the Second Amendment. This has nothing to do with taking away the right of someone to have a gun to protect themselves [sic]," McCarthy said.

Gottlieb disagreed.

"As far as Carolyn McCarthy is concerned, the Second Amendment doesn't protect any firearm," Gottlieb said. "If she had her wishes, she'd classify every firearm under a foot long as a 'Saturday Night Special,' and ban it, and characterize every gun over a foot long as an 'assault weapon,' and ban it also."

McCarthy and her anti-gun colleagues are using a "divide and conquer" strategy, according to Gottlieb, to disarm law-abiding Americans.

"If you pick on one type of gun at a time and say, 'the Second Amendment doesn't protect it,' most gun owners who don't own that kind of gun won't get upset and she might get her legislation passed," Gottlieb explained. "Then, lo and behold, she'll come back for another gun the next time and another gun the next time until there are no guns left."

McCarthy's comments seemed to support Gottlieb's assessment as she attempted to further demonize the .50 caliber.

"Look at this thing," McCarthy urged. "Do you want this in your home? Do you want your children to play with this?"

Burtt said McCarthy's comment betrays her ignorance of firearms and their safe handling.

"I don't want any children 'playing' with firearms, and they shouldn't even be touching them without the supervision of an adult," Burtt said. "I can't believe a representative of our Congress would make a statement like that."

Gottlieb, however, said he was not surprised by McCarthy's comments.

"Nobody said that the opponents of gun ownership are intellectually honest," Gottlieb said. "As far as these members of Congress are concerned, there's no such thing as a good gun."


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: bang; clueless; guncontrol; patrickkennedy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
Do the Kennedy's breed communists in their family? Kennedy's and company will not be happy until, all guns are banned and we the people look to government as our protector. The day they come for our guns, is the day, this is NO longer America. Think about it people!
1 posted on 02/09/2005 9:01:01 AM PST by kimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kimber

Looks like the turd doesn't fall far from the cow...


2 posted on 02/09/2005 9:04:13 AM PST by trebb ("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimber

Do the Kennedy's breed communists in their family?
======
Of course. Taken right out of the Communist Manifesto, that you must remove any form of power from the people you wish to dominate. Be it financial, faith, or armament, it is all the same. People are not allowed any form of power.

Someone should ask (don't even think about the MSM) these communists WHY THE BILL OF RIGHTS WAS WRITTEN (with focus on the Second Amendment)??? What was the major issue at the Constitutional Convention that caused the framers to generate them??? Ask that question of any of our fine flaming pinkos in the Congress or on the street. Just listen to the REAL agenda of our radical leftists, Hitlery, Pelosi, Kerry, Kennedy (all of them) --- every move they make, every agenda, is to move power to a socialist government AND AWAY FROM THE INDIVIDUAL (your freedom to protect your rights)...!!!


3 posted on 02/09/2005 9:07:01 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimber
Thug/psychopath/hysteric/mega-phony Patrick Kennedy is protected by armed bodyguards.

Liberals are The Annointed, above any of the endless laws they dump on us.. Laws are for the slaves and peons, never for the ruling class.

4 posted on 02/09/2005 9:08:18 AM PST by FormerACLUmember (Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimber

Well, the Kennedys do know quite a bit about mental illness.


5 posted on 02/09/2005 9:11:03 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimber

Insults from the left are merely confessions.

Besides, Patches the Dunce never worked a F*****g day in his life.


6 posted on 02/09/2005 9:12:48 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimber

I think the Gate security people at LAX should be armed. That way the next time a cocaine addicted congressman starts to push them around they can protect the traveling public. YTEDK.COM


7 posted on 02/09/2005 9:12:53 AM PST by lonerepubinma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimber
Typical Northeast liberals, trying to turn the populace into compliant, servile sheep. Come and get mine, you dictatorial pinko mofo's. I have a few million friends that'll meet you at the state line down here. Then we'll 'discuss' it.


8 posted on 02/09/2005 9:13:36 AM PST by Viking2002 (Let's get the Insurrection started, already..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimber; Admin Moderator
duplicate post:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1339314/posts (Patrick Kennedy Says Resistance to Gun Ban is 'Insanity')
9 posted on 02/09/2005 9:13:59 AM PST by pop-aye (For every journey, there is a higher path.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

Body guards? To keep people away from him, or to keep him away from people? Do tell.


10 posted on 02/09/2005 9:14:07 AM PST by Howlin (It's a great day to be an American -- and a Bush Republican!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kimber
Do the Kennedy's breed communists in their family?

at the knee of poppa Joe

11 posted on 02/09/2005 9:14:39 AM PST by maine-iac7 (...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Poor Patches; Gephardt had promised Patty he would be the next speaker of the House.

Now that he's not Gephardt's buttboy, he's lost.


12 posted on 02/09/2005 9:14:47 AM PST by Howlin (It's a great day to be an American -- and a Bush Republican!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kimber

good post. I remember a few years ago young Master Kennedy engaging in an ad hoc debate with Georgia's Bob Barr (I believe on a subject related to then-president Willie's defective trousers) and Patty vehemently held forth, until Barr concluded the 'conversation' by declaring:
"Just `cause you say it's so, don't make it so!"
Pat was dazed and confused . . . .

1. cold
2. dead
3. fingers


13 posted on 02/09/2005 9:16:11 AM PST by tumblindice (Our Founding Fathers: all conservative gun owners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb

LOL, I was gonna use the apple doesn't fall far from the tree line, but yours is much better.


14 posted on 02/09/2005 9:17:22 AM PST by G32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I am not sure if Patrick Kennedy's armed bodyguards are to keep people away from him, or to keep him away from people. He is a violent, explosive thug at times.

But like all liberals, he has brass tesicles chutzpah, accusing others of precisely his own defects and misbehavior.

15 posted on 02/09/2005 9:18:12 AM PST by FormerACLUmember (Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

brass tesicles = brass testicles


16 posted on 02/09/2005 9:18:35 AM PST by FormerACLUmember (Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kimber

"colleagues who do not share his support for a failed gun ban being reintroduced in the House are mentally ill."

Now that's the pot calling the kettle black.


17 posted on 02/09/2005 9:19:33 AM PST by JimWforBush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimber

He wants to take out guns away because 2 people in his family were shot to death?

OK, then we should also ban small aircraft ('cause his cousin died in one), and cars ('cause his father killed a woman in one, and another cousin had a traffic accident in a Jeep that paralyzed another woman), and skis and trees ('cause another cousin skied into a tree), ...


18 posted on 02/09/2005 9:20:42 AM PST by LibFreeOrDie (How do you spell dynasty? P-A-T-R-I-O-T-S!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
the only ban should be Hitlery, Pelosi, Kerry, Kennedy (all of them) this would protect more Americans.
19 posted on 02/09/2005 9:24:49 AM PST by River_Wrangler (You can't be lost if you don't care where you're at !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kimber

For a family the kennedy clan sure is in legal battles all the time. Even if it was poor judgement I think they could qualify for the insanity defense not the other way around.

Nut jobs in a position of power!


20 posted on 02/09/2005 9:28:35 AM PST by beltfed308
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson