Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smoke-free law 'would save lives'
BBC ^ | 8/02/05

Posted on 02/08/2005 9:29:26 AM PST by Jakarta ex-pat

There is powerful evidence that an outright ban on public smoking would save lives, doctors' leaders from across the world say.

A report by the British Medical Association's Tobacco Control Resource Centre describes the success of such anti-smoking laws in other countries.

Ireland has seen drops in cigarette sales and the US state California has reported fewer lung cancers.

But pro-smoking groups called evidence for passive smoking deaths a "myth".

In the recent White Paper on Public Health for England, Health Secretary John Reid announced plans for a partial ban smoking in enclosed public places.

For example, while pubs that serve food would have to enforce a ban, other pubs would not.

The BMA says this is insufficient and doomed to fail.

Dr Vivienne Nathanson, the BMA's head of science and ethics, said: "I hope John Reid listens to these doctors' testimonies.

"These doctors are telling us that partial measures don't work.

"It's time for the UK Government to play fair, and protect everyone from exposure to second-hand smoke at work."

But a Department of Health spokeswoman said: "As John Reid has made clear, we need to strike a balance between the rights of those who want to be protected against the harmful effects of other people's smoke and the rights of those who choose to smoke.

"That is why we are taking action to deliver a big increase in the number of smoke-free pubs and restaurants in places where food is served while ensuring that people who still want to smoke in the pub can still do so."

According to the Californian Medical Association, lung cancer rates have fallen six times faster in California than in US states without smoke-free laws since 1998.

In Ireland, cigarette sales fell by almost 16% in the first six months of the ban, according to the Irish Medical Organisation.

The evidence falls far short of justifying a total ban on smoking in every public place

Simon Clark, director of the smokers' lobby group FOREST, said: "The idea that people are dying in their hundreds or even thousands from passive smoking is a myth based on estimates, calculations and statistics which are in turn based on extremely dubious research.

"The evidence falls far short of justifying a total ban on smoking in every public place.

"Most people want no-smoking offices to be the norm, but in pubs, clubs and bars there is clear support for a choice of smoking and no-smoking areas and better ventilation."

BMA chairman, Mr James Johnson, said: "Powerful vested interests peddle myths that smoke-free legislation is unnecessary.

"They say that it is unworkable, unpopular, and will lead to economic ruin.

"Such predictions are little more than scaremongering. The evidence shows that smoke-free laws save lives."

He said if all UK workplaces were smoke-free, the tobacco multinationals would lose an estimated £310 million in sales every year.

Ian Willmore, from ASH, said: "A comprehensive end to smoking in work places and enclosed public places is essential to protect the health of non-smokers and encourage smokers to quit."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: internationalmafia; nannystate; orgainizedcrime; puff; pufflist; smoking; smokingbans; smuggling; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
These FACISTS are as despicable as the Anti-hunt, Anti-gun, environmental, "multicultural" lobby

Conservatives have won big in many areas in the last few years. However, in education the white flag was raised long ago.

Unless the right make an attempt to fight back, there will soon be nothing worth fighting for.

1 posted on 02/08/2005 9:29:27 AM PST by Jakarta ex-pat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jakarta ex-pat

Stairs kill people too.


2 posted on 02/08/2005 9:32:03 AM PST by mike182d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mike182d

Banning cars might be a good idea too.


3 posted on 02/08/2005 9:34:47 AM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jakarta ex-pat; All

Is there a single human being that hasn't died from something?


4 posted on 02/08/2005 9:36:16 AM PST by mike182d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jakarta ex-pat
Smoke-free law 'would save lives'

Fat-free law 'would save lives'
Bike-free law 'would save lives'
Car-free law 'would save lives'
How long before we get to Freedom-free law 'would save lives'?
...
5 posted on 02/08/2005 9:40:27 AM PST by mugs99 (Restore the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mugs99

While we are at it, lets not breathe the air or drink the water.


6 posted on 02/08/2005 9:43:45 AM PST by NY Attitude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jakarta ex-pat

I have no idea if banning smoking in public places will save lives (nor do I care) but I DO know that it will make smoking incredibly sexy. People will have Smoke Parties. Smoking will become a visual code for "rebel", "outsider" and "hip".

Additional bans or limits will just put tobacco where pot is today. Way to think ahead Brits!


7 posted on 02/08/2005 9:48:17 AM PST by Gingersnap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mike182d
"Is there a single human being that hasn't died from something?"

Me. I haven't died of anything.

Hmmm... Maybe I'm immortal.

8 posted on 02/08/2005 9:50:05 AM PST by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mike182d
Is there a single human being that hasn't died from something?

Exactly. The death rate will still be exactly 1.0 deaths/person. No law will change that.

9 posted on 02/08/2005 9:51:42 AM PST by Lekker 1 (A government policy to rob Peter to pay Paul can be assured of the support of Paul [G.B. Shaw])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mike182d

I think the outright banning of it everywhere is wrong, but I sure do enjoy going to a sports bar here in Bloomington, IN to watch a game without having to bring an oxygen tank along...

Why can't they MODERATE it? Would it not be possible to effect a law or ordinance of some sort to provide equal dining/recreational facilities for both smokers and non-smokers? I enjoy going to bars from time to time, but have not been able to do so due to my inability to deal with the horrible second-hand smoke produced by smokers. Now that the bar is smoke-free, a whole new crowd of people (who wouldn't normally frequent the establishment)enjoy going out for a drink or two. The business has actually increased and smokers still seem to have no problem going outside on the patio (with an overhang) to smoke.

I feel they really need to figure out a way to have establishments that allow for both smokers and non-smokers to enjoy themselves. It could be done. That way, the rights of smokers and non-smokers alike would be respected.


10 posted on 02/08/2005 9:54:30 AM PST by EnigmaticAnomaly ("“When you see a rattlesnake poised to strike, don't wait until it has struck before you crush it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gingersnap

"Smoking will become a visual code for "rebel", "outsider" and "hip"."

Isn't it already...?


11 posted on 02/08/2005 9:55:54 AM PST by EnigmaticAnomaly ("“When you see a rattlesnake poised to strike, don't wait until it has struck before you crush it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gingersnap

"Smoking will become a visual code for "rebel", "outsider" and "hip"."

Isn't it already...?


12 posted on 02/08/2005 9:55:58 AM PST by EnigmaticAnomaly ("“When you see a rattlesnake poised to strike, don't wait until it has struck before you crush it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EnigmaticAnomaly

sorry for the double post


13 posted on 02/08/2005 9:57:16 AM PST by EnigmaticAnomaly ("“When you see a rattlesnake poised to strike, don't wait until it has struck before you crush it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EnigmaticAnomaly
Why can't they MODERATE it?

Because it isn't something they want to do; it's something they need to do.

14 posted on 02/08/2005 10:16:41 AM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jakarta ex-pat

With all the smoking laws being enacted even here in the US. Now I see yesterday that Cuba has adopted the same.

Finally we have laws that even a communist likes. How ironic.

This madness has to stop!


15 posted on 02/08/2005 10:20:52 AM PST by beltfed308
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jakarta ex-pat
Forbidding tall buildings and bridges would prevent people jumping off them.
Forbidding cars would prevent traffic injury and death
Forbidding industry would prevent industrial accidents.

Forbidding smokers from collecting medicaid and medicare.... now there's a start. That is what we should push for. We should go on the offense.

After smokers, we then forbid overeaters from collecting aid... and then ....

16 posted on 02/08/2005 10:21:47 AM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jakarta ex-pat
There is powerful evidence that an outright ban on public smoking would save lives,

Maybe I am missing something here, but unless I am seriously mistaken, there is approximately a one-to-one correspondence between live births and deaths, everyone dies.

17 posted on 02/08/2005 10:28:35 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (GO ahead and ban 'em. Then imagine all those millions ofsmokers with a nicotine fit looking for YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gingersnap
Additional bans or limits will just put tobacco where pot is today

and about the time pot is legalized...

18 posted on 02/08/2005 10:30:17 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (GO ahead and ban 'em. Then imagine all those millions ofsmokers with a nicotine fit looking for YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jakarta ex-pat
I missed the section where the ban of all tobacco products is mentioned.
I am really sorry I missed it.
Can someone help me out and point it out for me?

Please?

19 posted on 02/08/2005 10:32:28 AM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen, ignorance and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jakarta ex-pat
Unless the right make an attempt to fight back, there will soon be nothing worth fighting for.

Don't put too much hope in that. A large portion of the "conservatives" on this site advocate such laws.

20 posted on 02/08/2005 10:37:06 AM PST by Protagoras (Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson