Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Super Bowl Spot Provokes After Only One Broadcast (NFL Execs Pull Go Daddy.com Commercial)
NY Times ^ | 2.8.05 | Stuart Elliot

Posted on 02/08/2005 7:22:19 AM PST by gopwinsin04

In a statement, Jon Nesvig, president for advertising sales for Fox Broadcasting in New York said that after the GoDaddy.com spot aired the first time, 'it became obvious that its content was out of step with the other ads and programming broadcast by Fox on Super Bowl Sunday, so Fox made the decision to drop the repeat airing.'

GoDaddy.conm president Bob Parsons said that he called Fox executives to find out why his 2nd spot was not run and was told that National Football League execs 'ordered it to be pulled.'

The commercial spot was filmed to look as if Super Bowl viewers were watching Congressional hearing testimony of a buxom blonde actress before a FCC committee. When a strap on her tank top breaks, an elderly man reaches for his oxygen mask and a prim woman harrumphs, 'Cant you just wear a turtleneck?'

The ad drew wildly ranging opinions in the polls and surveys after the game. In the 17th Annual USA TV Ad Meter, it finished 28th out of 55 rated by viewers.

But in a poll conducted on cellphones by AOL, open to members and non-members, the spot finished in the top 10 at Number 6. And it finished in 3rd place in a survey by TiVo, based on the data collected from 10,000 households with its digital video recorders.

Bob Garfield of Advertising Age Magazine gave GoDaddy.com three and 1/2 stars out of a possible four. 'Sure its juvenille. But that's the point, spoofing the post Janet Jackson mood of timidity.'

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: oldnews; repeat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
The no-fun league is back..
1 posted on 02/08/2005 7:22:20 AM PST by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

I suppose having a football game NOT drenched in sexual imagery would be impossible.


2 posted on 02/08/2005 7:24:25 AM PST by thoughtomator (reporting from Cylon-occupied Caprica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

You just knew someone would spoof last year's "costume malfunction".


3 posted on 02/08/2005 7:24:45 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

I loved the spot. That chick sure was hot.


4 posted on 02/08/2005 7:25:02 AM PST by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarf

It was unbelievably tacky.


5 posted on 02/08/2005 7:25:56 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: zarf

I thought that she was a brunette not a blond, as it says in the article.


6 posted on 02/08/2005 7:26:52 AM PST by CollegeRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: zarf

It got old the 427 time it was shown BEFORE game day. And I still have no idea what goDaddy.com is.


7 posted on 02/08/2005 7:27:40 AM PST by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%

'Tacky, yet refined..'


8 posted on 02/08/2005 7:28:03 AM PST by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: zarf
I loved the spot. That chick sure was hot.

There is a time and a place for this type of thing. The Super Bowl, which for millions of Americans is a family event - many with small children watching - is neither the time nor the place.
9 posted on 02/08/2005 7:29:06 AM PST by holymoly ("A lot" is TWO words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

Her physique was fake, but authentic.


10 posted on 02/08/2005 7:29:12 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: zarf

I wonder what they had planned for the second ad..


11 posted on 02/08/2005 7:29:15 AM PST by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CollegeRepublican

Yeah me too, but I just figured -"WHT I mustn't have been looking at her hair!"


12 posted on 02/08/2005 7:29:41 AM PST by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
I suppose having a football game NOT drenched in sexual imagery would be impossible.

You mean you want the players to stop patting each other on the buttocks?

13 posted on 02/08/2005 7:29:55 AM PST by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

The best spot of the day! I was praying that the other strap would break too.


14 posted on 02/08/2005 7:30:42 AM PST by wireman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WildTurkey

I was at a sports bar so that was the first time I saw it. I'm TVless.


15 posted on 02/08/2005 7:30:42 AM PST by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

LOL!

Exactly.


16 posted on 02/08/2005 7:30:57 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

She had twice the square area of clothing as the cheerleaders and a lot less airtime.


17 posted on 02/08/2005 7:31:17 AM PST by Fierce Allegiance (Prepare for Fierce Allegiance day, Feb 9th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RogueIsland

That's not sexual, only a perverted view would see it that way.


18 posted on 02/08/2005 7:32:25 AM PST by thoughtomator (reporting from Cylon-occupied Caprica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wireman

That and the Tobasco ad were unforgettable.


19 posted on 02/08/2005 7:32:25 AM PST by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance

But if the cheerleaders had breasts that size, they'd all have black eyes.


20 posted on 02/08/2005 7:33:32 AM PST by thoughtomator (reporting from Cylon-occupied Caprica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson