Posted on 02/08/2005 6:08:21 AM PST by conservativecorner
Breaking a curious ten-day silence on the most important recent story on his beat, WaPo media analyst Howard Kurtz has written a carefully crafted, linguistically bland semi-defense of CNN News chief Eason Jordan against charges he accused US troops of "targeting" 12 journalists. Kurtz seems to accept the extremely debateable assertion that Jordan's remarks were "off the record" and relies in great degree on excerpted statements made to him (or someone) by David Gergen that seem to track somewhat differently from what Gergen told Michelle Malkin. He also characterizes Jordan's critics as "conservative" bloggers, by which I take it Kurtz means those who supported the war in Iraq, a journalistically sloppy generalization. Kurtz does not acknowledge his own professional ties to CNN in the article, nor does he dwell on the uncomfortable fact that, as of now, the World Economic Forum is not releasing video tape of these proceedings. Until they do, this controversy will not be resolved. It will remain a he said/she said with most choosing to reference the witnesses that support their side. Kurtz, of course, omits testimony from several of the bloggers who were there, emphasizing instead some equivocal (when was he otherwise?) statements by Gergen. All in all, this is not an article, more of a place holder, with very little real digging done, despite another writer, Lisa de Moraes, being credited as a contributor at the end.
Of course, the reason this issue is of paramount importance is that we are in the midst of asymmetrical war. In such a situation, where propaganda determines victory, the power and significance of journalistic bias increases exponentially.
"......we are in the midst of asymmetrical war. In such a situation, where propaganda determines victory, the power and significance of journalistic bias increases exponentially."
This is the ONLY valid Vietnam analogy, and it should be SCREAMED as loudly and often as possible!
The problem here is Kurtz seems to be covering up for the media of which he belongs to.
I haven't followed this situation, but didn't the media go ape when the military, early in the war, blasted the hotel where many journalists stay?
BTW is STITES still alive?
Worth repeating 100X. .......I wish I new how to do that superscript thing. Maybe I'll call Dan at CBS.
Bump
Yup, it was the Palestine Hotel in Baghdad, where lots of journalists were holed up.. The Army was on one side of the river, Marines on the other side. Terrorists fired from the Palestine Hotel itself or from nearby. Not being the AR (Area of Responsibility) for the US forces on the other side of the river, they did not realize that the people spotting them from the hotel balcony were journalists execising their Battlefield Right to a Neutral Treestand and blasted away.
Thank you for making this observation. The folderol about Vietnam burns my ass.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.