To: Theo; shubi
if she's the only known wolphin, how does anyone know that she is capable of sexual reproduction? she may merely be a cetacean equivalent of a henny.
however, if you will cast your eyes slightly up the page, you will see an expression of my opinion of the proper use of the term "species":
#813, excerpt:
back to the Canis Family: IMO, dogs, coyotes, and wolves do not have sufficient genetic dissimilarity to be considered different species. That they don't often naturally interbreed doesn't matter - neither do Icelandic ponies with Shires, but both are still horses. Differences in temperament and morphology are likewise insufficient - there is more such variation among breeds of c.familiaris than there are between, say, a north american grey wolfe and a german sheherd.
IMO, "species" should denote a strict level of genetic incompatability when applied to sexually reproduced life forms.
"wolfe"? bedtime is coming on fast.
824 posted on
02/08/2005 8:00:43 PM PST by
King Prout
(Remember John Adam!)
To: King Prout
It had a baby. Perhaps that webpage hasn't been updated.
827 posted on
02/08/2005 8:03:29 PM PST by
Theo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson