Examples mean nothing when we disagree over their significance.
If you can't agree that code skipping disproves Evolutionary Theory, then there's no reason for me to bother throwing out examples of code skipping (that would simply open me up to further attacks while offering no chance of eventual agreement).
I have agreed in principle that code skipping would be troublesome. I am not a biologist, so I can't evaluate how troublesome a particular instance would be. I might say that if you are a sincere Christian, you would not consider a bit of bother excessive if it would save someone. That would be incredibly vain.
What you need to agree to is that you will not attempt to apply this principle to things that have historically been misclassified.