Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Non-Microsoft Browsers Have Spoofing Flaw
Netcraft ^ | 2/7/2005 | Netcraft

Posted on 02/07/2005 11:29:30 AM PST by KwasiOwusu

All non-Microsoft browers include a flaw that allows URL spoofing using Unicode characters, which can be exploited by phishing scams seeking to steal login information for online banking accounts. The spoofing flaw, which is demonstrated on the web site of the Shmoo Group, works in the Firefox, Mozilla and Opera browsers, as well as the Safari browser for Macs.
The spoof exploits flaws in how the browsers interpret Unicode characters. A link using Unicode characters to replace the letter "a" in "Paypal" will display as www.paypal.com in the browser, but send users to www.xn--pypal-4ve.com - which then displays "www.paypal.com" in its address bar. A similar spoof works on SSL-enabled URLs (https) commonly used on banking and e-commerce sites.

Unicode is a broader character set that includes non-English characters as well as symbols, which is being used on the Internet to support Internationalized Domain Names (IDN). The affected browsers support IDN, while Microsoft's Internet Explorer does not.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.netcraft.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: browsers; computersecurity; firefox; gateslapdog; iuseamacsoiambetter; kneepads; littleprecious; lowqualitycrap; marrymebill; microsoft; microsoftastroturf; mskneepadbrigade; netscape; paidshill; redmondianrobots; redmondpayroll; redmondstooge; safari; trollfromredmond; wontyoumarrymebill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-213 next last
To: kevkrom
Of course, the reason it affects all of them couldn't be Microsoft's unicode-handling API, could it?

The article says Macs are vulnerable. What part of the Mac OS did Microsoft write?

21 posted on 02/07/2005 11:40:15 AM PST by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KwasiOwusu

I guess code writing is like speaking in tongues. I'm always surprised that wankers can spoof, snurf, smurf PC's to get them to do just about anything other than what they're supposed to do.


22 posted on 02/07/2005 11:40:28 AM PST by Time is now (We'll live to see it......Does anyone see it yet?....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KwasiOwusu

linux-loving characters will be saying that this is nothing but Microsoft putting out bogus press releases!


23 posted on 02/07/2005 11:41:05 AM PST by NoClones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407
I never put personal info on a site that I have been linked to. I only go to those sites directly.

What they normally do is spoof the e-mail address and put the link in an e-mail. The e-mail looks real, like it came from the legitimate source and the link looks legitimate also. They are getting pretty savvy and I am sure folling more people than ever.

24 posted on 02/07/2005 11:41:28 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne
The attack can be disabled in Firefox and Mozilla by setting 'network.enableIDN' to false in the browser's configuration (enter about:config in the address bar to access the configuration fucntions).

However according to several posters on Slashdot, that setting isn't saved once you quit and relaunch Firefox.

25 posted on 02/07/2005 11:41:52 AM PST by ThinkDifferent (These pretzels are making me thirsty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
"Of course, the reason it affects all of them couldn't be Microsoft's unicode-handling API, could it?"

Hehehehehehehehehehehehe.
That's so funny.
Umm.. Does Microsoft write the unicode-handling API for Linux too?
26 posted on 02/07/2005 11:42:12 AM PST by KwasiOwusu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

BINGO!


27 posted on 02/07/2005 11:42:30 AM PST by Time is now (We'll live to see it......Does anyone see it yet?....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mannaggia l'America
The article says Macs are vulnerable. What part of the Mac OS did Microsoft write?

All the pieces that don't quite work right, of course.

28 posted on 02/07/2005 11:42:45 AM PST by Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

Exactly. Never, ever click on a link in an email directing you to a site where you have an account.


29 posted on 02/07/2005 11:43:41 AM PST by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne

I've accessed the network enableIDN....now how do I edit it...mine is set to "true"


30 posted on 02/07/2005 11:46:36 AM PST by Katya (Homo Nosce Te Ipsum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent
I just tried quitting and relaunching Firefox and the change was still there. I'll check it later but, it worked this time.
31 posted on 02/07/2005 11:46:51 AM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mannaggia l'America

I did miss the part about the Macs. The flaw is apparently in the IDN standard -- comments from Slashdot indicate that MSIE with an IDN plug-in is also subject to the same spoof. It's kind of hard to blame the browser makers for actually following the standard, of course...


32 posted on 02/07/2005 11:47:01 AM PST by kevkrom (If people are free to do as they wish, they are almost certain not to do as Utopian planners wish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
Nevermind the fact this is a configuration setting that can be turned off right?

So can ActiveX in IE, but lots of people keep saying that IE is bad because of ActiveX.

33 posted on 02/07/2005 11:47:06 AM PST by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent
However according to several posters on Slashdot, that setting isn't saved once you quit and relaunch Firefox.

It just worked for me.

34 posted on 02/07/2005 11:47:14 AM PST by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey
Unfortunately, anyone stupid enough to fall for a phishing scam is also WAY too stupid to reconfigure their browser.

The problem is that phishers are getting much better. I've gotten a couple of Paypal scam emails that looked authentic, and only by viewing the HTML source could I tell what was going on. If somebody clicks on a link and sees "https://www.paypal.com" in the address bar and an SSL indicator, I can't blame them a whole lot for believing it's the real site.

35 posted on 02/07/2005 11:47:19 AM PST by ThinkDifferent (These pretzels are making me thirsty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: KwasiOwusu

I had no idea everyone expected their browser to also be their nanny.

Gimme a break - if you're not surfing porn sites or engaged in other unsafe Internet behavior, this won't happen to you in any browser.


36 posted on 02/07/2005 11:47:42 AM PST by thoughtomator (reporting from Cylon-occupied Caprica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Katya
I've accessed the network enableIDN....now how do I edit it...mine is set to "true"

Double click on it; it will change to false.

37 posted on 02/07/2005 11:48:07 AM PST by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Katya
Double click on the network.enableIDN line. The "true" will turn to "false."
38 posted on 02/07/2005 11:48:18 AM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
yeah, thats exactly what the FBI did.

right on the heals of their new Microsoft system w/ 20,000 desktops running Windows XP which was a flop...

to top it off, their outlook based email system just got hacked into yesterday

ah, Microsoft. the company that sells you anti-Spyware protection to protect you from malware in software written by ...Microsoft. kinda sounds like the mafia.

39 posted on 02/07/2005 11:48:43 AM PST by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Diplomat; MineralMan; KwasiOwusu; Mr. K
Yawn...

1) When has anyone ever said firefox was bulletproof. M$ schills here have such a complex anything that does not worship at the throne of ie is considered 'open source nuts saying their software is indestructible'

2) The best part is Microsoft is partly to blame here, its their API thats busted, this does not work with firefox or mozilla on Linux. I ran the test page there and it did not work.

Even with #2 the best thing for firefox to do would be ship with network.enableIDN set to off by default as most people do not need it.

40 posted on 02/07/2005 11:49:17 AM PST by N3WBI3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-213 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson