Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/07/2005 7:56:16 AM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
To: SmithL

I'll bet the phrases "2.57 trillion" and "austere" have never before appeared in the same story.


2 posted on 02/07/2005 7:57:51 AM PST by TheBigB (Ask Fierce Allegiance about his suck emergencies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

>> and 5.6 percent at the Environmental Protection Agency.
I was so hoping to see that the EPA was scrapped. Shucks, maybe next time.


3 posted on 02/07/2005 7:59:46 AM PST by Brian328i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Finally, some fiscal responsibility from our President. Reducing the size and scope of government is one of the major tenets of conservatism. Good move.


4 posted on 02/07/2005 8:00:51 AM PST by Reagan Man ("Don't let the bastards grind you down." General "Vinegar Joe" Stilwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

I can hear the liberals whine already. This has to be done as fast as possible.


5 posted on 02/07/2005 8:02:47 AM PST by grapeape ("If your attack is going too well, you're probably walking into an ambush.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
I remember when the first $100 billion dollar budget was adopted under Eisenhower. Compare that to current proposal. Comparable dollars aside, it is a lot of walking around money for the politicians to play with.
8 posted on 02/07/2005 8:06:45 AM PST by cynicom (<p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

NPR/PBS? Wanna bet they get funded?


12 posted on 02/07/2005 8:08:33 AM PST by Drango (tag line under repair)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
The spending document projects that the deficit will hit a record $427 billion this year, the third straight year that the red ink in dollar terms has set a record. Bush projects that the deficit will fall to $390 billion in 2006 and gradually decline to $233 billion in 2009 and $207 billion in 2010.

Those figures don't include the $80 billion Bush wants for Iraq, the cost of making the tax cuts permanent, or the cost of allowing for private accounts for Social Security. So I wonder what the defecits really will be? How how really meaningless these supposed cuts actually are.

15 posted on 02/07/2005 8:13:53 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Friends in DC refer to this bueget as the "Lobbiests' Protection Act of 2005."


18 posted on 02/07/2005 8:15:39 AM PST by MindBender26 (Having your own XM177 E2 means never having to say you are sorry......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
Many of the spending cuts in the budget are repeats of efforts the administration has proposed and Congress has rejected previously.

Let's see if Congress can get their butts in gear.

21 posted on 02/07/2005 8:21:48 AM PST by JohnnyZ ("Thought I was having trouble with my adding. It's all right now." - Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
seeks deep spending cuts across a wide swath of government from reducing subsidies paid to the nation's farmers, cutting health care payments for poor people and veterans and trimming spending on the environment and education

I should hope so.

22 posted on 02/07/2005 8:22:17 AM PST by RockinRight (It's NOT too early to start talking about 2006...or 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Are these actual cuts in spending, or cuts in the increases of spending??


23 posted on 02/07/2005 8:23:16 AM PST by RockinRight (It's NOT too early to start talking about 2006...or 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
But Democrats complained that Bush was resorting to draconian cuts that would hurt the needy in order to protect his first term tax cuts that primarily benefited the wealthy.

What do you mean, "media bias"?

25 posted on 02/07/2005 8:26:15 AM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Spending, meanwhile, would grow by 3.5 percent to $2.57 trillion.

Anyone know if that's in real dollars?

29 posted on 02/07/2005 8:28:14 AM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
C-span1 NOON (est)

News Conference Fiscal Year 2006 Budget Office of Management and Budget White House, Eisenhower Executive Office Building

Bolten, Joshua B., Director, Office of Management and Budget

Mr. Bolten will present the president's budget request for fiscal year 2006.

30 posted on 02/07/2005 8:28:21 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
Bush's 2006 spending plan, for the budget year that begins next Oct. 1, counts on a healthy economy to boost revenues by 6.1 percent to $2.18 trillion. Spending, meanwhile, would grow by 3.5 percent to $2.57 trillion.

Something's not making sense here. If revenues are growing considerably faster than expenditures, that would cause the deficit to go down, would it not? So how is it that they're saying that this would be a "record" deficit?

33 posted on 02/07/2005 8:34:31 AM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
2006 Budget
36 posted on 02/07/2005 8:38:51 AM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Wow - this is the same budget my wife presented to me yesterday.


38 posted on 02/07/2005 8:41:41 AM PST by Rutles4Ever (This is my tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
cutting health care payments for poor people and veterans

Why the hell is he messing with veteran's benefits?

44 posted on 02/07/2005 8:58:42 AM PST by pickemuphere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

I wish we could get rid of PBS. Does anyone watch PBS ?


47 posted on 02/07/2005 9:03:10 AM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Eliminate the following:

The Department of Energy
The Department of Agriculture
The Department of Education
The EPA
The Department of Transportation
Department of Health and Human Services
Department of Housing and Urban Development

Kill all boondoggle projects such as the bridge to nowhere in Alaska. All other departments to get increases only in line with inflation, with the exception of Defence.

Regards, Ivan


66 posted on 02/07/2005 10:57:52 AM PST by MadIvan (One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson