Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mike182d

"By their fruits, you shall know them"

The CC has a long and notorious history of political expediency and doctrinal compromise. It's what comes from adopting a belief that their clergy continue to get "revelations" about the suppossed "incomplete" scriptures. Non sola scriptura reaps what it sows.

It's a first cousin to the "living Constitution" mindset: "Go with the times."


19 posted on 02/07/2005 7:45:56 AM PST by mikeus_maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mikeus_maximus
their clergy continue to get "revelations" about the suppossed "incomplete" scriptures. Non sola scriptura reaps what it sows.

2 Peter 1:20-21
"Know this first of all, that there is no prophecy of scripture that is a matter of personal interpretation, for no prophecy ever came through human will; but rather human beings moved by the holy Spirit spoke under the influence of God."

With all due respect, the Bible just didn't float down on a cloud in its completed form. It was compiled and canonized by "clergy" with their "revelations."
27 posted on 02/07/2005 7:50:56 AM PST by mike182d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: mikeus_maximus

Why is it that we have hundreds of "sola scriptura" denominations that each have very different interpretations of what scripture says? Isn't that the definition of a "living Constitution"? Every denomination has set itself up as the final arbiter of what God was saying.

Just a thought.


28 posted on 02/07/2005 7:51:47 AM PST by lnbchip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: mikeus_maximus
"The CC has a long and notorious history of political expediency and doctrinal compromise. It's what comes from adopting a belief that their clergy continue to get "revelations" about the suppossed "incomplete" scriptures. Non sola scriptura reaps what it sows.

It's a first cousin to the "living Constitution" mindset: "Go with the times.""

I agree. I would also state that is quite difficult to undertand the big picture, if big holes are within it. One should understand, for example, that Darwin's grandfather wrote a poem.

(see: Erasmus Darwin (The real source of 'Frankenstein' as well as Evolution).

From that poem, the godless book, Frankenstein was written. From the grandfather's original experiments, Evolution was 'naturally' born by the grandson.

Talk about multi-generaltional curse; talk about 'by their fruits'!

50 posted on 02/07/2005 8:01:26 AM PST by gobucks (http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/laocoon.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: mikeus_maximus
Non sola scriptura reaps what it sows.

Where is "the Bible alone" theory in the Bible?

Did Jesus command his disciples to write the New Testament?

Who came up with the idea?

Who determined which writings would comprise the New Testament?

Who preserved the Bible prior to the invention of the printing press?

229 posted on 02/07/2005 11:46:41 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson