Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Worried that the nation's aging nuclear arsenal is increasingly fragile, American scientists have begun designing a new generation of nuclear arms meant to be sturdier and more reliable and to have longer lives

Of course the New York Slimes fails to mention that their pal BJ Klintoon did absolutely nothing to maintain our vital weapons programs.

1 posted on 02/06/2005 6:35:20 PM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee

No! He outsourced that job to China.


2 posted on 02/06/2005 6:40:38 PM PST by dgallo51 (DEMAND IMMEDIATE, OPEN INVESTIGATIONS OF U.S. COMPLICITY IN RWANDAN GENOCIDE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Some critics say checking the reliability of the new designs is likely to require underground testing, violating the ban and inviting other nations to do the same, thereby endangering American security.

Am I the only one here who wonders whether these unnamed "critics" really exist?
4 posted on 02/06/2005 6:43:04 PM PST by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I'm betting that this is a subtle way of saying that everybody has our designs so we are starting over with better security this time.


5 posted on 02/06/2005 6:43:55 PM PST by Thebaddog (Dawgs off the coffee table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

If Kerry had won and the leftist dims had their way America would have been disarmed by the slow corrosion of our nuke arsenal....unilateral disarmament by neglect.


6 posted on 02/06/2005 6:44:03 PM PST by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Asked about a possible attack by the United States or Israel, which have both said a nuclear-armed Iran would be unacceptable, Rohani said: "If such an attack (against Iran's atomic facilities) takes place then of course we will retaliate and we will definitely accelerate our activities to complete our (nuclear) fuel cycle." Speaking in a rare interview, Rohani said Iran's ability to produce its own nuclear parts had made it "invulnerable" to attack since it could simply rebuild whatever was destroyed.
8 posted on 02/06/2005 6:45:52 PM PST by granite (WHY ARE WE IN IRAQ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
But critics say it could needlessly resuscitate the complex of factories and laboratories that make nuclear weapons and could possibly ignite a new arms race.

Screw the critics, they don't know s--t from shinola, and in that same spirit, maybe they could explain just WHO they think is going to engage in a 'new arms race' with the United States? Who has the military industrial base to do this effectively and actually compete with us?

As for spending only 9 million on modernization of our nuclear arsenal? Holy smokes, make it 9 BILLION and do it all, and do it right!
9 posted on 02/06/2005 6:46:47 PM PST by Mad Mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

got news for the critics: there already IS a new arms race going.


11 posted on 02/06/2005 6:50:31 PM PST by King Prout (Remember John Adam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Don't know how to link?


12 posted on 02/06/2005 7:10:51 PM PST by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
TEHRAN (Reuters) - "But I do not think the United States itself will take such a risk ... They know our capabilities for retaliating against such attacks," the mid-ranking cleric added.


14 posted on 02/06/2005 7:25:35 PM PST by granite (WHY ARE WE IN IRAQ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

You mean Poor old Slim Pickens coulda been riding a dud?


17 posted on 02/06/2005 7:31:53 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

[Experts say a costly federal program to assess and maintain their health cannot ultimately confirm their reliability because a global test ban forbids underground test detonations.]

I can think of another way to test them.


18 posted on 02/06/2005 7:54:51 PM PST by spinestein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
"...critics say it could needlessly resuscitate the complex of factories and laboratories that make nuclear weapons and could possibly ignite a new arms race."

Between us and who?
Cuba?
Canuckistan?

Ireland?

19 posted on 02/06/2005 8:02:08 PM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

So the expected lifetime was 15 years, and most of them are older than 20 years. Should I be more worried than I am? I was under the assumption they are indeed quite old, but will still do the job if asked.

Question: This expected 15 year lifespan, is this in reference to the wear and aging of the overall mechanicl and electronic components of the weapon, or the nuclear decay of the isotopes cores themselves? (i.e. the Pu-241 pits, etc?)

Is there a chance our weapons may fizzle if used due to the fact that the core metals have decayed into other elements, or will we just get a much lower yield?

Any experts out there?

Bones


20 posted on 02/06/2005 8:05:08 PM PST by Bones75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

BTTT


26 posted on 02/06/2005 8:22:36 PM PST by need_a_screen_name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
And the democrats always fail that it was a democrat who developed the Nuclear bomb (Manhattan project) and a democrat who dropped not one but two nuclear bombs on civilians causing a lot of "collateral damage".

I always like to remind them of those two facts.
30 posted on 02/06/2005 10:31:23 PM PST by Coleus (Oppose Amnesty for Illegal Aliens http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/1335643/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Klintoon. Worst president ever. I am against ANY AND ALL U.S. nuclear disarmament or signing treaties like the START series. We need to have the biggest, baddest, planet-destroying arsenal we can. It is ultimatly the only way to stay free.


32 posted on 02/07/2005 12:19:28 AM PST by Paul_Denton (The UN is UN-American! Get the UN out of the US and US out of the UN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

If credible, this makes us the new emperor with no clothes...


35 posted on 02/07/2005 1:48:25 AM PST by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson