Skip to comments.
Surprise, surprise: The lottery rifles the pockets of the poor
San Antonio Express-News ^
| 02/06/2005
| Ken Rodriguez
Posted on 02/06/2005 5:48:16 PM PST by SwinneySwitch
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
There's a reason why they call the lottery an idiot tax, Ken.
To: SwinneySwitch
You have to figure out some way to tax them.
2
posted on
02/06/2005 5:50:04 PM PST
by
U S Army EOD
(John Kerry, the mother of all flip floppers.I)
To: SwinneySwitch
Government-run lotteries seek to tax poverty out of existence.
3
posted on
02/06/2005 5:50:05 PM PST
by
Tax Government
(Boycott and defeat the Legacy Media. Become a monthly contributor to FR.)
To: SwinneySwitch
I have no sympathy
Most don't pay taxes or live on the dole
The lottery could be viewed as a way to recoup some of those losses
4
posted on
02/06/2005 5:50:25 PM PST
by
5Madman2
(DemocRATS are Vermin)
To: SwinneySwitch
Let them keep playing the lottery! I love watching lottery players willfully giving money over to the state. For a lot of them, it's about the only real tax they'll pay throughout the year.

5
posted on
02/06/2005 5:51:14 PM PST
by
rdb3
(The wife asked how I slept last night. I said, "How do I know? I was asleep!")
To: SwinneySwitch
Are those stats for avg amount speant per month only applicable for the population of people who actually do participate in the lottery? I would hope they aren't average stats that take the entire population of citizens into consideration.
To: SwinneySwitch
Jeff Foxworthy tells redneck jokes about this FACT. This is not news.
Rich people spend (waste?) more on expensive wines and 'exquisite' restaurant meals, and buy the same coat for 3X what my 'poor' sister-in-law pays on the bargain rack.
People get to make their own choices. Get over it.
7
posted on
02/06/2005 5:51:33 PM PST
by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitor)
To: SwinneySwitch
I guess Jeff Foxworthy was right. He said the lottery is a redneck's retirement plan.
8
posted on
02/06/2005 5:53:58 PM PST
by
Arkie2
To: SwinneySwitch
Lotteries are get rich quick schemes for people that are bad at math.
9
posted on
02/06/2005 5:53:58 PM PST
by
bad company
(Having a political debate with a liberal is like playing hangman with someone that can't spell.)
To: SwinneySwitch
IIRC, Jefferson called the lotteries the fairest tax, for the burden was always borne by willing carriers (I might be misattributing the quotation). The article omits that there must have been packs of armed goons forcing the low-income participants to buy more tickets while letting better-off participants off.
10
posted on
02/06/2005 5:55:08 PM PST
by
GSlob
To: SwinneySwitch
As Claude Raines said in "Casablanca", "Shocking".
11
posted on
02/06/2005 5:55:13 PM PST
by
buccaneer81
(Rick Nash will score 50 goals this season ( if there is a season)
To: SwinneySwitch
Lotteries: a tax on hope.
12
posted on
02/06/2005 5:56:22 PM PST
by
Fzob
(Why does this tag line keep showing up?)
To: SwinneySwitch
If only my state income tax were VOLUNTARY. The lottery is not a tax, people. It is voluntary. You don't HAVE to play, you know. Besides, it is a bargain. For the price of one ticket, you can play the "what would I do if I win" game. I have never played the lottery, though.
To: SwinneySwitch
I only play when it gets to around $70Million. And for at least the next day I ignore TV, Radio, Newspaper, and Internet, and I walk around knowing I'm worth millions! :)
.... then someone ruins it for me.
14
posted on
02/06/2005 6:00:00 PM PST
by
theDentist
(Jerry Springer: PBS for White Trash)
To: bad company
Lotteries are get rich quick schemes for people that are bad at math. Lotteries are a tax for folks who can't do math.
15
posted on
02/06/2005 6:00:10 PM PST
by
humblegunner
(And who knows what else?)
To: SwinneySwitch
...excellent post! Using sinful vice to cheat stupid people is not good conservatism.
16
posted on
02/06/2005 6:02:54 PM PST
by
familyop
("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
To: SwinneySwitch
Texans who earn the least spend more per player on the lottery than those in the highest income groups. So? This is some how a surprise?
How do you think the high income group got that way?
17
posted on
02/06/2005 6:02:55 PM PST
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Naked Mole Rats are sweet, gentle and love to cuddle. Bring a colony home today for your Valentine)
To: SwinneySwitch
There is nothing new about this. Maryland says they cant allow slot machines because poor people would play them . Hell the better off people are traveling 100 miles to Delaware to and West Virginia to give those states their money while I cant pay for my gas at the local store because I have to wait for the ones who cant afford to go to Delaware to passover their money on the Lotto.What a batch of BS.
To: College Repub
19
posted on
02/06/2005 6:11:07 PM PST
by
SwinneySwitch
(Texas, bless God.)
To: SwinneySwitch
The lottery rifles the pockets of the poor Lotteries do no such thing. These people CHOOSE to participate. The fact they are of a lower income bracket say nothing more than the fact that these people have low incomes due to their life choices (for the most part).
"Progressive tax" -- now THAT is rifling pockets.
20
posted on
02/06/2005 6:16:22 PM PST
by
freedumb2003
(Don't bring a moped to a car fight)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson