[Monterrosa-24]

Lincoln was a complete louse.

Collectively the CSA and the USA would have been much stronger than the USA alone as been.

Lincoln was the great destroyer.

[MRMEAN]

Collectively the CSA and the USA would have been much stronger than the USA alone as been.

Elaborate, please.

[Sivad]

Collectively, China and the USA would be much stronger than
the USA would be alone. Like the USA and CSA, "collectively"
doesn't mean much if the entities in question are not on
the same page. And, just how strong would they be when
Kentucky and Tennessee seceded from the CSA in 1884, Texas
and Louisiana in 1893, and South Carolina in 1905?

Lincoln was no louse. But, yes, Lincoln was the great des-
troyer, slavery destroyer, that is.

[A Jovial Cad]

"Lincoln was the great destroyer"

Uh-huh...that may wash for a former "resident of El Salvador," but doesn't quite cut the mustard for the vast majority of Americans who know the real history of our country, as opposed to the fairy tales you seem to have learned.

Peddle your noxious bilge elsewhere--back down south in banana republic territory, preferably. Thank you.

[Non-Sequitur]

Lincoln was the great destroyer.

In what way?