She tried to bill them for a motion sensor and her husband is making harassing calls. Who is in the wrong here.
I'm with you.
I have a feeling that the sheriff didn't "advise" her to leave her house that night; they may have said "If you're not comfortable here, is there somewhere else you can go?"
I want to know where mother and her 19 year old daughter were during all this commotion? Did they not open the door and look around?
And after the families offered to pay for anything above what her health insurance didn't pay, why did she continue on with this?
Even if what they girls did was ill-advised, after she heard what it was they meant to convey, what kind of person would continue on with this?
As a side note: we have no way of knowing what those discussions concerning the offers to pay her bill went like; now, judging from the fact that the husband, despite a judgement, continues to make harassing phone calls, I'll speculate they didn't go "well," if you get my drift.
I'm thinking that the families sought legal advice about their best road to getting this behind them and the attorney, after hearing all the facts, might have "mentioned" that the lady AND her husband sounded like a whack job and that they needed to consider whether this could go on until the end of time, thus the "we'll pay if you say no more claims" letter.
To me -- and I am a court reporter -- it sounds like that wasn't enough for the woman and her husband; perhaps they were going to milk it for all they could get. After all, if circumstances are all as reported, the trip to the hospital for "anxiety" -- and the apology and offer to pay -- should have been the end of it.