Posted on 02/05/2005 1:53:47 AM PST by Stoat
bump
No,the cops are a mental case,and she knew that and exploitetd that. It is typical.
Cops only want to protect their jobs, not find the truth.
From now on, I'm going out with inanimate objects.
As for the woman, she should spend at least the same amount of time in prison as those two young men combined.
No,women are treated like children. The case of man in my town who lifted a piece of wood to protect his wife from neighbors arguing against her landed him in jail because the neighbors claimed he was threatening his wife. She kept saying he was protecting her. No, dumb arse cops would not even listen to her because of stupid "recant theories" on domestic abuse.
There is an agenda of nanification and disarmament of men. Once accused of domestic violence, YOU CANNOT HAVE GUNS.
Oh, it comes against the stupid cops themselves too. One cop was told to resign by the mayor because he was accused of sexual harassment by a female cop. Ridiculous. He was complaining about her taking him in, out and down. Well, stupid, you do the same thing to citizens and promote that crap. Hell, they will even protect the boyfriends from husbands more than they will protect the husbands.
It's a psycho sicko agenda.
I do not blame him considering the case he had in front of him.
Typicaly women will pick up fights at home, while men do it abroad. The feminist theory on domestic violence knowingly exploits women's typical territory of violence against men.
So you say that people should get as good lawyers as they can afford according to the free market rules. And that government should not intervene and should not make socialist redistribution of resources in the court system.
Did I get you right?
Those who make false accusations should suffer the maximum punishment that their victims would have suffered if convicted.
His daddy should have told him the facts of life.Telling a girl you just want to be ____buddies doesn't mean anything to her except she's completed the first step in getting her hooks into you.
Mommas and girlfriends talk about the tactical warfare of relationships while men are talking football. We ain't got a chance.
Go ahead and have that beer! Why the hell not?
You're being pitifully stupid. If you see my follow up post, you'll note that I criticise you for dragging your protectionist philosophy into something entirely unrelated. This initial post was intended to hit you over the head for being a protectionist blatherer.
As for lawyers, the real answer is not socialist redistribution, but simplification of the law. Alexis de Tocquville described a situation on his visit in America in which law was within the reach of everyone, and that it was rare to find people not acquainted with their rights. In that era, it was not the simplest thing to get rich as a lawyer either.
To put it another way, the Founding Fathers clearly intended for law not to be the exclusive province of specialists; think about the simple beauty of the Constitution, for example. Of course, you don't see this as a regrettable incident which illustrates how far the present law is from the Founders intent - rather you use it as an excuse to criticse something you hate, the free market.
One wonders - for all your bluster about you Patsies being close to the Founders intent, who is more concerned about the Founders, and who simply has a socialist axe to grind?
Ivan
goldstategop, why do you keep including that quote from "Denny Crane" in every one of your posts? First off, it's not even remotely clever or profound. Second, the place to put that is in your tagline, where it belongs.
um...it's 4 beers later ;-)
A mental case with the knowledge of a licensed clinical social worker. We will hear from her again and I don't mean in a positive sense.
Amen.
4 bottles of beer on the, 4 bottles of beer, you take one down and pass it around..........
You should be fired. You were to be there by 5:00a.m..
There should be a law that demands she serve the time of the person she falsely accused. If he were to get 25 years if convicted then that is the time a lying woman should serve for her falsehood.
I agree completely. Government writes the rules and they protect their own above what is right. It should be quite logical to sue individual cops. It would helpe weed the bad ones out fast.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.